شناسایی مناطق مستعد توسعه فیزیکی در پهنه شهری و پیراشهری دیواندره با به‌کارگیری سند ژئومورفولوژیکی و مدل‌های تلفیقی

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل

نویسندگان

1 گروه ژئومورفولوژی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

2 گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، دانشکده جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

10.22059/jphgr.2026.413134.1007929

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی مناطق مستعد توسعه فیزیکی شهر دیواندره بر پایه تدوین سند ژئومورفولوژیکی و تحلیل مخاطرات طبیعی انجام‌شده است. تنوع فرم‌ها و فرایندهای ژئومورفیک و شرایط توپوگرافیک منطقه، در کنار ایجاد ظرفیت‌های توسعه، محدودیت‌ها و تنگناهایی را نیز برای گسترش کالبدی شهر به همراه دارد. ازاین‌رو، در گام نخست سند ژئومورفولوژیکی پهنه شهری با تمرکز بر فرم‌ها، فرایندها و مخاطرات غالب تهیه شد و سپس با رویکردی تلفیقی، مناطق مناسب توسعه در مقیاس شهری و پیراشهری شناسایی گردید. داده‌های مورداستفاده شامل تصاویر ماهواره‌ای، مدل رقومی ارتفاعی 5/12 متری ALOS PALSAR و نقشه زمین‌شناسی 1:100000 بود و تحلیل‌ها با بهره‌گیری از نرم‌افزارهای  ArcGIS, TerrSetو Super Decisions و مدل‌های گامای فازی و WLC انجام شد. نتایج سند ژئومورفولوژیکی نشان داد فرم تپه ماهوری با شیب کم که حدود 2/47 درصد (معادل 2/39 کیلومترمربع) از محدوده مطالعاتی را دربر می‌گیرد، به دلیل کمترین میزان فرایندهای فعال و مخاطرات، مناسب‌ترین بستر توسعه شهری است و عمدتاً در بخش‌های شمالی و شمال شرقی قرار دارد. همچنین بر اساس مدل‌های گامای فازی و WLC به ترتیب حدود 2/25 و 7/28 درصد (به معادل 1/9 و 2/10 کیلومترمربع) از این فرم دارای پتانسیل بالای توسعه است که از نظر مکانی با نتایج سند ژئومورفولوژیکی همخوانی دارد. در مجموع، یافته‌ها بیانگر کارآمدی اسناد ژئومورفولوژیکی و مخاطراتی در برنامه‌ریزی و ارتقای تاب‌آوری شهری و قابلیت استفاده از نتایج به عنوان پایگاه داده مدیریتی برای توسعه آتی شهر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identification of Suitable Areas for the Physical Expansion of the Urban and Suburban Areas of Divandarreh Using Geomorphological Documents and Integrated Models

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sina Karami 1
  • Mamand Salari 1
  • Hamid Ganjaeian 2
1 Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran
2 Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
This study aims to identify suitable areas for the physical development of Divandarreh through the preparation of a geomorphological and hazard documentation framework. Due to its geographical location and diverse geomorphological and topographical conditions, the city faces both opportunities and constraints for spatial expansion. Geomorphological landforms not only shape the natural landscape but also directly influence settlement suitability and urban development decisions. In the first stage, a geomorphological document of the urban area was prepared focusing on landforms, dominant processes, and hazards. In the second stage, a comprehensive spatial analysis was conducted to identify development-prone areas in both urban and peri-urban zones. The study utilized Google Earth imagery, MODIS images, a 12.5-m ALOS PALSAR Digital Elevation Model, and a 1:100,000 geological map. Analytical tools included ArcGIS, TerrSet, and SuperDecisions software, along with field observations. Fuzzy Gamma and Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) methods were applied for spatial modeling.  Results indicate that low-slope hilly landforms, covering about 39.2 km² (47.2%) of the study area, represent the most suitable geomorphological unit for urban expansion due to minimal active processes and hazards, mainly located in the northern and northeastern parts of the city. According to the Fuzzy Gamma and WLC models, approximately 25.2% and 28.7% (equivalent to 9.1 and 10.2 km²), respectively, have high development potential. The strong quantitative and spatial consistency between the geomorphological document and model outputs confirms the validity of the research and highlights the effectiveness of geomorphological and hazard mapping in urban planning and resilience enhancement.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Iran’s geographical and geological setting places the country among the ten most disaster-prone regions in the world with respect to natural hazards. disasters such as earthquakes, floods, droughts, soil erosion, and landslides continuously threaten cities and human settlements, causing extensive damage. Among Iranian provinces, Kurdistan Province, due to its diverse geomorphological characteristics, mountainous structure, and numerous drainage basins, is considered one of the most sensitive areas with respect to hydro-geomorphological hazards. Studies indicate that a significant portion of the province’s land is exposed to seismic risk, severe soil erosion, and destructive floods, with the increasing trend of flood occurrence in recent decades resulting in substantial social and economic losses. Divandarreh city, as one of the major cities of Kurdistan Province, has experienced rapid physical expansion due to its geographical location, residential attractiveness, and rural-to-urban migration. If such development proceeds without adequate consideration of natural and geomorphological conditions, it may lead to increased urban vulnerability and the intensification of hazards. The prevalence of floods, landslides, slope instability, and soil erosion, combined with uncoordinated physical development, highlight the necessity of revising urban planning and management approaches in Divandarreh. Geomorphology, through its focus on landforms and governing processes, plays a crucial role in guiding sustainable urban development and provides a scientific basis for site selection, hazard zoning, and risk reduction. Given that urban development in Iran—particularly since the 1960s—has often occurred with limited integration of environmental sciences, many cities, including Divandarreh, face serious environmental and hazard-related challenges. Therefore, examining the physical development of Divandarreh through a geomorphological and hazard-oriented approach, aimed at identifying suitable, restricted, and prohibited development areas and preparing a realistic environmental framework, is essential for achieving sustainability and enhancing urban resilience.
 
Methodology
A diverse set of data and tools was employed to achieve the research objectives. Library-based data were used to compile the theoretical framework and identify regional natural hazards through the review of theses, scientific articles, books, and relevant research projects. Statistical data included climatic and demographic information, collected from relevant organizations and institutions. Visual and spatial data consisted of Google Earth and Landsat satellite imagery, geological maps, and a 12.5 m resolution ALOS PALSAR digital elevation model, which were utilized for spatial and geomorphological analyses. Field surveys were conducted to validate and complement the collected data and to assess the actual conditions of the study area. Regarding research tools, physical instruments such as GPS devices and digital cameras were used for field data collection, while conceptual tools included various software platforms and analytical models. Google Earth Engine was applied to generate vegetation density maps; ArcGIS was utilized for spatial mapping and analysis; TerrSet software was employed to implement the WLC model; SuperDecisions was used to execute the ANP model; SPSS was applied for statistical calculations; and Google Earth was utilized for monitoring and visual assessment of the study area. The research was conducted in two main stages: first, the preparation of a comprehensive geomorphological and hazard framework for Divandarreh city and its surrounding area, and second, the identification of areas suitable for physical urban development.
 
Results and Discussion
The results of geomorphological and spatial analyses indicate that the natural structure of Divandarreh city plays a decisive role in shaping the physical development pattern of residential areas. The dominance of steep hilly terrains over more than 94% of the study area, together with the presence of deep river valleys and floodplains, reflects unstable geomorphological conditions and a high level of natural hazard risk. These characteristics increase the sensitivity of the urban core and its periphery to hazards such as flooding and slope movements, significantly limiting the availability of land suitable for sustainable development. The outputs of multi-criteria decision-making models, including fuzzy gamma, WLC, and ANP, reveal that parameters such as slope, lithology, and distance from watercourses exert the greatest influence on land suitability for physical development. Accordingly, the northern parts of the urban area and sections along the Divandarreh–Saqqez transportation corridor exhibit the highest development potential due to gentler slopes, more favorable elevations, and greater distances from high-risk zones. In contrast, the southern parts of the city, steep valleys, and floodplains were identified as highly vulnerable areas where physical development would entail serious risks. The consistency among the results of different models confirms the reliability of the findings and demonstrates that the integrated application of geomorphological analysis and spatial decision-making models provides an effective approach for identifying safe zones for urban development.
 
Conclusion
The findings demonstrate that physical development of residential areas in Divandarreh city, if undertaken without adequate consideration of geomorphological characteristics and natural hazards, may result in undesirable consequences such as increased risk, environmental damage, and urban instability. The high diversity of landforms, the predominance of steep terrains, and the presence of flood-prone and landslide-susceptible areas underscore the necessity of adopting a preventive, science-based approach to urban planning. The integration of remote sensing data, GIS techniques, and multi-criteria decision-making models revealed that only a limited portion of the urban area and its surroundings—particularly the northern zones and areas along the Divandarreh–Saqqez axis—possess relatively suitable conditions for physical development. Consequently, concentrating urban expansion within these areas can reduce natural hazards while promoting safer and more sustainable development. Moreover, the preparation of a geomorphological and hazard-based framework, as the main outcome of this research, serves as a strategic tool for urban managers and planners by facilitating informed development guidance, controlling physical expansion, and reducing urban vulnerability. Ultimately, this study emphasizes the importance of integrating geomorphological assessments and risk evaluation into higher-level urban planning documents and offers a practical model applicable to other cities with similar natural conditions.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution

Sina Karami: Writing the initial draft, compiling the introduction, collecting data and sources, and final editing the text.
Mamand Salari (corresponding author): Research design, developing the methodology, analyzing and interpreting data, supervising the research process
Hamid Ganjaian: Processing spatial data, preparing maps and graphic outputs, implementing spatial models.

 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Geomorphological document؛ Urban physical expansion؛ Hazards؛ Integrated Models
  • Divandarreh
  1. ابراهیم‌زاده، عیسی و اسمعیل‌نژاد، مرتضی. (1396). پناهندگان اقلیمی: چالش آینده تحولات منطقه‌ای (مطالعه موردی: خراسان جنوبی). فصلنامه جغرافیا و توسعه، 15(48)، 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2017.3347
  2. رجبی، معصومه؛ تیمورزاده، نیر و داداشی رستمی ثالث، مجید. (1404). اولویت‌بندی توسعه فیزیکی بهینه شهر صوفیان با تأکید بر عوامل ژئومورفیک. جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، 29(91)، 247-267. https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2024.57976.3184
  3. رضایی، محمدرضا؛ رفیعیان، مجتبی و حسینی، سیدمصطفی. (1394). سنجش و ارزیابی میزان تاب‌آوری کالبدی اجتماع‌های شهری در برابر زلزله (مطالعه موردی: محله‌های شهر تهران). پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 47(4)، 609-623. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2015.51228
  4. رضائی‌مقدم، محمدحسین؛ سمندر، نسرین و رحیم‌پور، توحید. (1404). پهنه‌بندی ناپایداری دامنه‌ها با استفاده از روش‌های تصمیم‌گیری SWARA و CRITIC در محدوده شهر تبریز. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای طبیعی، 57(2)، 39-55. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2025.399814.1007899
  5. رهنما، محمدرحیم؛ قنبری، محمد؛ محمدی حمیدی، سمیه و حسینی، سیدمصطفی. (1398). ارزیابی و سنجش زیست‌پذیری شهری در کلان‌شهر اهواز. مجله شهر پایدار، 2(2)، 1-17.
  6. زندمقدم، محمدرضا. (1402). پهنه‌بندی شهر بر اساس میزان آسیب‌پذیری در مقابل مخاطرات طبیعی (مطالعه موردی: نسیم‌شهر). جغرافیا و مطالعات محیطی، 12(46)، 60-77. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20087845.1402.12.46.4.8
  7. سالاری، ممند؛ نیری، هادی؛ گنجائیان، حمید و امانی، خبات. (1396). مکان‌گزینی جهات مناسب توسعه شهری کامیاران با رویکرد مخاطره‌شناسی مبتنی بر اعمال مناطق ممنوع ژئومورفولوژیکی. مدیریت مخاطرات محیطی، 4(4)، 419-436. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhsci.2018.252694.341
  8. سعیدی، بهنام؛ فخری، الهام و آزاده، حسن. (1394). چارچوب سندای برای کاهش خطرپذیری سوانح 2030-2015. پژوهشکده سوانح طبیعی ایران، انتشارات پدیده.
  9. شبابانی، مسعود؛ کارگر، بهمن و رحیمی، محسن. (1401). ارائه الگوی مدیریت بحران شهری (مطالعه موردی: منطقه 11 شهر تهران). پژوهش‌های مدیریت انتظامی، 17(4)، 9-35. https://doi.org/10.22034/pmsq.2022.1268862.1540
  10. شریفی، حسین؛ رمضانی‌پور، مهرداد و ابراهیمی، لیلا. (1403). بررسی توسعه فضای شهری در راستای مواجهه با مخاطرات محیطی (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان نور). تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، 24(75)، 354-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.61186/jgs.24.75.4
  11. عامری، مهناز. (1403). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی معیارهای طبیعی جهت پهنه‌بندی مناطق مستعد توسعه فیزیکی شهر اهواز. جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، 7(1)، 782-806. https://doi.org/10.22034/gahr.2024.449494.2076
  12. فرج‌زاده، منوچهر. (1392). مخاطرات اقلیمی ایران. انتشارات سمت.
  13. کیانی، سارا؛ احمدآبادی، علی و آذریون، فرزاد. (1403). واکاوی اثر سیل‌خیزی در جنوب شهر تبریز بر اجرای پروژه آزاد راه قطعه شش ارومیه – تبریز. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای طبیعی، 56(3)، 115-131. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2024.371498.1007807
  14. گنجائیان، حمید؛ نصرتی، مژگان؛ ابراهیمی، عطرین و قیصریان، سیدسعدی. (1404). ارزیابی وضعیت آسیب‌پذیری روستاهای مناطق کوهستانی در برابر مخاطرات طبیعی (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای منطقه اورامان). پژوهش‌های محیطی در قلمروهای کوهستانی، 1(2)، 57-70. https://doi.org/10.22034/ermr.2024.63510
  15. نیری، هادی؛ سالاری، ممند؛ گنجائیان، حمید و امانی، خبات. (1396). ارزیابی ژئومورفولوژیکی تناسب زمین برای گسترش کالبدی شهر سنندج با اعمال مناطق ممنوعه. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 5(1)، 125-147. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2017.63213
  16. Ameri, M. (2024). Identification and prioritization of natural criteria for zoning areas prone to physical development in Ahvaz city. Geography and Human Relationships, 7(1), 782-806. https://doi.org/10.22034/gahr.2024.449494.2076 [In Persian]
  17. Cao, N., Wen, Y., Wang, J., Gao, X., & Sun, P. (2024). Identifying shrinking cities from a physical city perspective and influencing factors: A case study of the Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle in China. Applied Geography, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103314
  18. Chini, M., Pelich, R., Pulvirenti, L., Pierdicca, N., Hostache, R., & Matgen, P. (2019). Sentinel-1 InSAR coherence to detect floodwater in urban areas: Houston and Hurricane Harvey as a test case. Remote Sensing, 11, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11020107
  19. Dandapat, K., & Panda, G. (2018). A geographic information system-based approach of flood hazards modelling, Paschim Medinipur district, West Bengal, India. Journal of Jamba, 10(1), 518. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v10i1.518
  20. Deng, Y., Shen, R., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Chen, X., Tang, S., Sun, W. Y., & Tan, H. (2024). Invisible hazards: Exploring neonicotinoid contamination and its environmental risks in urban parks across China. Science of the Total Environment, 954, 162589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162589
  21. Din, R., Butt, F., Ahmad, F., & Raza, A. (2026). Assessment of the relationship between seismic vulnerability and seismic risk perception: A case study of Peshawar, Pakistan. GeoHazards, 7(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards7020064
  22. Ebrahimzadeh, I., & Esmailinejad, M. (2017). Climate refugees: A future challenge of regional transformations (Case study: South Khorasan Province). Geography and Development Quarterly, 15(48), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2017.3347 [In Persian]
  23. Effat, H. A., & El-Zeiny, A. M. (2020). Integration of satellite data and spatial decision models for zoning new urban communities in El-Fayoum Desert. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13(20), 1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06031-0
  24. Farajzadeh, M. (2013). Climate risks of Iran. Samt Publications [In Persian]
  25. Ganjaeian, H., Nosrati, M., Ebrahimi, A., & Ghisarian, S. S. (2025). Assessing the vulnerability of villages in mountainous areas to natural hazards (Case study: Villages of Oraman region). Journal of Environmental Research in Mountainous Regions, 1(2), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.22034/ermr.2024.63510 [In Persian]
  26. Huang, H., Lu, Z., Fan, X., Zhai, W., Zhang, L., Xu, D., Qin, H., Lanza, K., & Hang, Y. (2024). Urban heatwave, green spaces, and mental health: A review based on environmental health risk assessment framework. Science of the Total Environment, 948, 165901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165901
  27. Jeong, T., Jeong, D., & Kim, M. (2026). Development of an urban digital twin based on geospatial data: A case study of Busan, South Korea. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 15(6), 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15060247
  28. Kang, S., Yeom, J., & Jung, J. (2021). Urban form and natural hazards: Exploring the dual aspect concept of urban forms on flood damage. Sustainability, 13(16), 9007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169007
  29. Khan, M. Z., Gupta, J., Singh, S., Ben Hasher, F. F., Kanetaki, Z., & Zhran, M. (2026). Spatial quantification of urban environmental stress through scale-aware multi-indicator integration. Land, 15(6), 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15060981
  30. Kiani, S., Ahmadabadi, A., & Azariuon, F. (2024). Analysis of flooding in the south of Tabriz city and its effects on the implementation of the sixth section of freeway project of Urmia-Tabriz. Physical Geography Research, 56(3), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2024.371498.1007807 [In Persian]
  31. Lee, S. (2007). Application and verification of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide susceptibility mapping. Environmental Geology, 52(4), 615-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0491-y
  32. Liang, J., Chen, C., Song, Y., Sun, W., & Yang, G. (2024). Long-term mapping of land use and cover changes using Landsat images on the Google Earth Engine Cloud Platform in bay area: A case study of Hangzhou Bay, China. Sustainable Horizons, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.horiz.2023.100061
  33. Meng, M., Dabrowski, M., & Stead, D. (2020). Enhancing flood resilience and climate adaptation: The state of the art and new directions for spatial planning. Sustainability, 12(19), Article 7864. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197864
  34. Nayyeri, H., Salari, M., Ganjaeian, H., & Amani, K. (2017). Geomorphological assessment of land suitability for the physical expansion of Sanandaj City applying restricted areas. Geographical Urban Planning Research, 5(1), 127-145. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2017.63213 [In Persian]
  35. Qi, S., Hu, S., & Cao, S. (2024). Spatial and temporal changes of social vulnerability of cities to natural hazards in Zhejiang province, China. Heliyon, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27120
  36. Rahnama, M. R., Ghanbari, M., Mohammadi Hamidi, S., & Hosseini, S. M. (2019). Assessment and measurement of urban livability in Ahvaz metropolis. Journal of Sustainable City, 2(2), 1-17.  [In Persian]
  37. Rajabi, M., Teimorzade, N., & Dadashi Rostami Sales, M. (2025). Prioritizing the optimal physical development of Sufian city with emphasis on geomorphic factors. Journal of Geography and Planning, 29(91), 247-267. https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2024.57976.3184 [In Persian]
  38. Rezaei Moghaddam, M. H., Samandar, N., & Rahimpour, T. (2025). Zoning of slope instability using SWARA and CRITIC decision-making methods in the Tabriz City region. Physical Geography Research, 57(2), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2025.399814.1007899 [In Persian]
  39. Rezaei, M. R., Rafieian, M., & Hosseini, S. M. (2015). Measurement and evaluation of physical resilience of urban communities against earthquake (Case study: Tehran neighborhoods). Human Geography Research, 47(4), 609-623. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2015.51228 [In Persian]
  40. Rosa, A. G. F., Silva, W. D. O., Fontana, M. E., Levino, N., & Guarnieri, P. (2024). A GIS-based multi-criteria approach for identifying areas vulnerable to subsidence in the world's largest ongoing urban socio-environmental mining disaster. The Extractive Industries and Society, 19, 103566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.103566
  41. Saeedi, B., Fakhri, E., & Azadeh, H. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. Iran Natural Disaster Research Institute, Padideh Publications.  [In Persian]
  42. Salari, M., Nayeri, H., Amani, K., & Ganjaeian, H. (2017). Locating suitable directions for Kamyaran urban development through a hazardology approach based on the application of geomorphologically restricted areas. Environmental Management Hazards, 4(4), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhsci.2018.252694.341 [In Persian]
  43. Shababani, M., Kargar, B., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Proposing an urban crisis management model (Case study: District 11 of Tehran city). Police Management Studies Quarterly, 17(4), 9-35. https://doi.org/10.22034/pmsq.2022.1268862.1540 [In Persian]
  44. Sharifi, H., Ramezanipour, M., & Ebrahimi, L. (2024). Investigating the development of urban space in the face of environmental hazards (Case study of Noor County). Journal of Geographical Science, 24(75), 354-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.61186/jgs.24.75.4 [In Persian]
  45. Su, W., Ye, G., Yao, S., & Yang, G. (2014). Urban land pattern impacts on floods in a new district of China. Sustainability, 6(10), 6488-6508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6106488
  46. Sundaram, S., Devaraj, S., & Yarrakula, K. (2023). Mapping and assessing spatial extent of floods from multitemporal synthetic aperture radar images: A case study over Adyar watershed, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 63006-63021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26467-7
  47. Ustaoglu, E., & Aydınoglu, A. C. (2020). Suitability evaluation of urban construction land in Pendik district of Istanbul, Turkey. Land Use Policy, 99, 104783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104783
  48. Wen, Y., Liu, B., Li, Y., & Zhao, L. (2024). A review of research progress on the impact of urban street environments on physical activity: A comparison between China and developed countries. Buildings, 14(6), 1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061779
  49. Zand Moghadam, M. R. (2023). Urban paneling based on the level of vulnerability against natural disasters (Crisis management): A case study on Nasimshahr. Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 12(46), 60-77. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20087845.1402.12.46.4.8 [In Persian]