پژوهش های جغرافیای طبیعی

پژوهش های جغرافیای طبیعی

مدلسازی فضایی اثر پارامترهای توپوگرافی بر متغیرهای اقلیمی و شاخص پوشش گیاهی در حوضه های کوهستانی (مطالعه موردی: شمال شرقی شهرستان اقلید)

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار ژئومورفولوژی گروه جغرافیا- دانشگاه شیراز
2 دانشیارژئومورفولوژی، گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه شیراز
3 استادیار اقلیم شناسی- بخش جغرافیا- دانشگاه شیراز
چکیده
مدیریت پایدار حوضه‌های آبخیز نیازمند شناخت ارتباط متقابل بین پارامترهای اقلیمی، ویژگی‌های مورفومتری و پوشش گیاهی است. این مطالعه با هدف بررسی ارتباط بین پارامترهای اقلیمی (دما، بارش و تبخیر)، شاخص پوشش گیاهی NDVI و ویژگی‌های مورفومتری در حوضه آبخیز شمال شرقی شهرستان اقلید انجام شد. داده‌های اقلیمی یک دوره ۱۰ ساله از شش ایستگاه سینوپتیک جمع‌آوری گردید. نقشه‌های ارتفاع، شیب و لندفرم با استفاده از مدل رقومی ارتفاع 2022) و شاخص موقعیت توپوگرافی (TPI) در محیط GIS تهیه شدند. شاخص NDVI نیز از تصویر لندست ۸ (2022) محاسبه گردید. نتایج نشان داد که با کاهش تبخیر و دما (همبسته با افزایش ارتفاع)، لندفرم‌ها به سمت قله‌ها و خط‌الراس‌ها تغییر کرده و شدت فرسایش کاهش می‌یابد. با افزایش بارندگی، ارتفاع و کلاس لندفرم افزایش یافت، در حالی که رابطه بارندگی با شیب غیرخطی بود (افزایش تا کلاس ۵ و سپس کاهش). همچنین با افزایش بارندگی، فرسایش به سمت طبقات پایین‌تر کاهش یافت. به طور کلی، ارتباط سیستمی معناداری بین پارامترهای اقلیمی و مورفومتری در حوضه مورد مطالعه وجود دارد و ارتفاع به عنوان عامل کنترل‌کننده اصلی، توزیع دما، بارش و تبخیر را تعیین می‌کند. یافته‌های این پژوهش می‌تواند در مدیریت و پهنه‌بندی حوضه‌های آبخیز مشابه مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Spatial Modeling of the Effect of Topography Parameters on Climatic Variables and Vegetation Index in Mountainous Watersheds (Case Study: Northeast of Eqlid County)

نویسندگان English

marzieh mokarram 1
Saeed Negahban 2
mohammad hasan mahoutchi 3
1 Department of Geography, Shiraz University
2 Shiraz University
3 Department of Geography, Shiraz University
چکیده English

Introduction

Sustainable management of mountainous watersheds is one of the fundamental challenges in semi-arid regions of Iran. This management requires a deep and integrated understanding of the interactions between topographic landforms and the spatial distribution of climatic variables and vegetation cover. However, in many mountainous regions of Iran, particularly in watersheds with significant morphological diversity, integrated analysis and spatial modeling of these relationships have received less attention. Mountainous watersheds, due to their considerable elevational differences, typically exhibit significant variations in temperature, precipitation, and evaporation from lowlands to high elevations. This climatic diversity, in turn, affects vegetation distribution, landform types, soil erosion intensity, and ultimately ecosystem stability. The present study aimed to spatially model the effect of topographic parameters (elevation and slope) on the distribution of climatic variables (temperature, precipitation, and evaporation) and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in the watershed located northeast of Eqlid County. This region, situated on the eastern slopes of the central Zagros Mountains, exhibits considerable elevational diversity (ranging from approximately 2323 to 3842 meters above sea level) as well as notable climatic and vegetation variability, making it an ideal case study for such an investigation. The findings of this research can enhance the fundamental understanding of climate-geomorphology-vegetation interactions and provide a quantitative tool for management zoning of similar watersheds.

Method

To conduct this research, climatic data including mean annual temperature, annual precipitation, and annual evaporation were first collected from six active synoptic stations within and around the region (Abadeh, Eqlid, Kafter, Izadkhvast, Shahreza, and Sadeghabad stations) over a ten-year statistical period (2011–2021). After quality control and homogeneity assessment, the data were imported into a Geographic Information System (GIS) environment. To prepare continuous zoning maps of climatic variables across the entire watershed, the Kriging interpolation method was employed, with elevation incorporated as an auxiliary variable. This method was selected due to its ability to account for the spatial structure of the data and to provide lower estimation errors for the study area. To extract topographic parameters, a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) with a spatial resolution of 30 meters, derived from ASTER satellite data (2022), was prepared. From this model, a slope map (in percent) and an elevation class map (with 200-meter intervals) were generated. Furthermore, to classify the landforms of the region, the Topographic Position Index (TPI) was calculated at two scales: local (3×3 cell window) and regional (45×45 cell window). Based on TPI values and considering surface slope, ten landform types including narrow valleys, U-shaped valleys, plains, open slopes, mid-slope ridges, peaks, and ridgelines were identified in the region. For quantitative assessment of vegetation cover, a Landsat 8 OLI satellite image from 2015 was acquired, and necessary preprocessing steps including atmospheric correction (using the FLAASH method) and geometric correction (using ground control points with an error of less than 0.5 pixels) were applied. Subsequently, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was calculated using the red band (band 4) and the near-infrared band (band 5). Soil erosion intensity was also estimated using the empirical EPM (Gavrilović) model. Finally, spatial relationship analysis between topographic parameters and climatic variables was conducted using two complementary approaches: (1) extracting temperature, precipitation, and evaporation values for each elevation class and plotting the trend of variations, and (2) comparing climatic classes with elevation, slope, and landform classes through cross-tabulation analysis in the GIS environment.

Results

The findings of this study conclusively demonstrated that elevation, as the most important controlling topographic parameter, determines the spatial distribution of all three climatic variables (temperature, precipitation, and evaporation). With increasing elevation from the northern parts (2323 m) to the southern parts of the watershed (3842 m), mean annual temperature decreased from over 12°C to below 4°C. Annual precipitation showed an opposite trend, increasing from less than 250 mm in the northern lowlands to more than 650 mm in the southern high elevations. Evaporation also decreased predictably with increasing elevation; evaporation rates exceeded 7000 mm in the northern lowlands, while decreasing to less than 2000 mm at elevations above 3500 meters. The relationship between slope and climatic variables was more complex and non-linear. Analyses revealed that with increasing precipitation (corresponding with increasing elevation), slope values initially increased up to precipitation class 5 and then showed a relative decrease in higher classes (very high elevations). This pattern indicates the presence of relatively flat summit surfaces at very high elevations. Regarding landforms, results showed that with decreasing temperature and evaporation (i.e., moving toward higher elevations), landforms shifted from valleys and plains in the north (lower landform classes) toward peaks and ridges in the south (landform class 10). NDVI exhibited a parabolic relationship with temperature; maximum NDVI (0.49) was recorded at mid-elevations and relatively moderate temperatures (temperature classes 3 and 4), while in the coldest areas (elevations above 3800 meters with temperatures below 4°C), vegetation cover declined due to physiological limitations caused by cold, frost stress, and thin soils (NDVI approximately 0.10). Regarding erosion, results showed that with decreasing evaporation and temperature classes and with increasing precipitation classes, erosion intensity shifted from high and moderate classes to low classes.

Conclusions

This study conclusively demonstrated the existence of a strong and significant systemic relationship between topographic parameters (elevation and slope) and climatic variables (temperature, precipitation, and evaporation) in the northeast Eqlid watershed. Elevation, as the primary controlling factor, determines the distribution of temperature, precipitation, and evaporation, and these climatic variables in turn affect landform type, erosion intensity, and vegetation patterns. The non-linear relationship between slope and precipitation and the parabolic relationship between temperature and NDVI indicate the complexity of environmental interactions in mountainous watersheds and demonstrate that increased precipitation alone is not sufficient for vegetation development; temperature acts as a limiting factor at very high elevations. From a practical perspective, by accurately measuring topographic parameters (which can be readily extracted from digital elevation models), the spatial distribution of climatic variables can be estimated with acceptable accuracy in similar mountainous watersheds. Therefore, topography-based spatial modeling can serve as a powerful auxiliary tool in areas with limited meteorological station coverage.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Watershed
Climatic parameters
Topographic Position Index
Landform
Vegetation Index
  1. احمدیان، سید حسن. (1380). بررسی و تحقیق در مورد وضعیت رسوب زایی حوضه سرخ‌آباد سوادکوه به‌منظور اولویت‌گذاری زیر حوضه‌ها با استفاده از آمار رسوب و مدل MPSIAC. هفتمین کنگره علوم خاک ایران. تهران.
  2. صادق‌زاده ریحان و یاراحمدی، جمشید. (1397). ارزیابی مدل WEPP در برآورد میزان فرسایش و رسوب در اراضی مارنی منطقه خواجه. پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمّی 2(1)، 112-97. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22519424.1392.2.1.7.6
  3. راستگو، سعید؛ قهرمان، بیژن؛ ثنایی نژاد، سیدحسین؛ داوری، کامران و خداشناس، سعیدرضا. (1385). برآورد فرسایش و رسوب حوضه آخیز تنگ کنشت با مدل‌های تجربی MPSIAC و EMP به کمک GIS. علوم آب‌وخاک (علوم و فنون کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی)، 10(1)، 91-104. https://doi: 20.1001.1.24763594.1385.10.1.7.2
  4. مقیمی، ابراهیم و نگهبان، سعید. (1391). بررسی فرسایش در حوضه آبخیز رودخانه شورفدامی (استان فارس) با استفاده از مدل آنتروپی. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای طبیعی، 44(3)، 16-1. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr. 10.22059/jphgr.2012.29211
  5. برزو، آرش؛ ممیزی، محمدرضا و نیک‌اندیش، عباسعلی. (1387). مقایسه سه روش EPM, MPSIAC, PSIAC در برآورد میزان فرسایش و رسوب در حوضه چهل چشمه استان فارس. کشاورزی پویا، 5(1)، 29-19.
  6. ثنایی نژاد، سید حسین؛ آستارایی، علیرضا؛ میرحسینی، پریسا و کشاورزی، عاطفه. (1387). استفاده از تصاویر ماهواره‌ای برای مطالعات پوشش گیاهی (مقایسه شاخص‌های مختلف گیاهی – مطالعه موردی منطقه نیشابور). مجموعه مقالات پنجمین کنگره ملی مهندسی ماشین‌های کشاورزی و مکانیزاسیون.
  7. هادی قورقی، جبار؛ درختی، سعید؛ عبداللهی، زهرا؛ غلامی، لیلا و خالدی درویشان، عبدالواحد. (1404). ارزیابی مقایسه‌ای برآوردهای فرسایش خاک و تولید رسوب در حوزه آبخیز دولت‌آباد با استفاده از مدل‌های EPM، MPSIAC وIntErO.  مهندسی اکوسیستم بیابان، 14(4)،25-40. https://doi: ‌10.22052/deej.2025.256485.1099
  8. رمضانی، بهمن؛ ابراهیمی، هدی و حق‌پرست مژردهی، لیلا. (1396). نقش پارامترهای محیط طبیعی در میزان فرسایش و تولید رسوب به دو روش MPSIAC و EPM (مطالعه موردی: حوضه آبخیز سد برنجستانک.  مهندسی جغرافیایی سرزمین، 1(2)، 59-49.
  9. پردل، فاطمه؛ ابراهیمی، عطاالله و عزیزی، زهرا. (1396). ارزیابی شاخص‌های گیاهی برآورد پوشش و تولید گیاهی مراتع مناطق خشک در دوره‌های رویشی مختلف. خشک بوم. 7(2)، 71-57.https://doi: 10.29252/aridbiom.7.2.57
  10. میرآخورلو، خسرو و حسینی، سید زین‌العابدین. (1385). تخمین مقدار علوفه مراتع با استفاده از داده‌های ماهواره‌ای (مطالعه موردی حوزه آبخیز دماوند). فصلنامه تحقیقات مرتع و بیابان ایران، 13 (2)، 127-138.
  11. عابدینی، موسی و شبرنگ، شنو. (1393). بررسی میزان فرسایش خاک و رسوب‌دهی در حوضه آبخیز مشکین چای به روش EPM. جغرافیا و توسعه، 11(پیاپی 30)، 87-100.  doi: 10.22111/gdij.2014.1554
  12. عابدینی، موسی؛ جوادی علی‌بابالو، سجاد؛ مصطفی‌زاده، رئوف و پاسبان، امیر حسام. (1401). اولویت‌بندی زیر حوزه‌های آبخیز کوزه‌توپراقی بر اساس فرسایش خاک و تولید رسوب با استفاده از پسیاک اصلاح‌شده (MPSIAC) در محیط .GIS مطالعات جغرافیایی مناطق خشک، 13(49)، 18-39. https://doi: 10.22034/jargs.2023.373965

 

  1. Abedini, M., Shabrang, S., & Esmali, A. (2013). The evaluation of soil erosion and sediment Meshkinchai watershed to EPM method. Geography and Development Quarterly, 11(30), 87-100. https:// doi: 10.22111/gdij.2014.1554 [in Persian]
  2. Abeddini,M, Javadi َ Alibabalo,S, Mostafazadeh,R and Pasban,A. (2022). Prioritization of Kozetopraghi sub-watersheds based on estimated soil erosion and sediment yield using modified PSIAC model and GIS. Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies, 13(49), 39-18. https://doi: 10.22034/jargs.2023.373965 [in Persian]
  3. S. Rastgoo, B. Ghahraman, H. Sanei Nejad, K. Davary, S. R. Khodashenas. (2013). Estimation of Erosion and Sedimentation of Tang-e-Kenesht Basin with Empirical Models of MPSIAC and EPM Using GIS. jwss 2006; 10 (1):91-105. https://doi: 20.1001.1.24763594.1385.10.1.7.2 [in Persian]
  4. Ahmadian, H. (2001). Investigation and research on the sediment yield status of the Sorkh Abad watershed in Savad Kooh for prioritizing sub-basins using sediment data and the MPSIAC model. Paper presentation at the 7th Congress of Soil Science of Iran. [in Persian]
  5. Bagherzadeh, A., & Mansouri Daneshvar, M. R. (2011). Sediment yield assessment by EPM and PSIAC models using GIS data in semi-arid region. Frontiers of Earth Science, 5(2), 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-011-0168-z
  6. Barzou, A., Mamizi, M. R., & Nikandish, A. (2008). Comparison of three methods EPM, MPSIAC, and PSIAC in estimating erosion and sediment yield in the Chehel Cheshmeh basin of Fars Province. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 15(1).. [in Persian]
  7. Brouce, K. W., Issa, D., Rex, D. P., John, A. H., Bradley, C. R., & Morris Southward, G. (1995). Satellite-based herbaceous biomass estimates in the pastoral zone of Niger. Journal of Range Management, 48(2), 159-164.
  8. Garrido-Leiva, J., Durán-Gárate, L., & Pérez-Martínez, W. (2026). Topographic Modulation of Vegetation Vigor and Moisture Condition in Mediterranean Ravine Ecosystems of Central Chile. Forests, 17(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17060706
  9. Hadi Ghorghi, J., Derakhti, S., Abdullahi, Z., Gholami, L. and Khaledi Darvishan, A. (2025). Comparative Evaluation of Soil Erosion and Sediment Yield Estimation in the Dowlatabad Watershed Using the EPM, MPSIAC, and IntErO Models. Desert Ecosystem Engineering, 14(48), 25-40. https://doi: ‌10.22052/deej.2025.256485.1099[in Persian]
  10. Macdonald, J. A., Barnard, D. M., Mankin, K. R., Miner, G. L., Erskine, R. H., Poss, D. J., ... & Mikha, M. M. (2025). Topographic position index predicts within-field yield variation in a dryland cereal production system. Agronomy, 15(6), 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15061304
  11. Milevski, I. (2008). Estimation of soil erosion risk in the upper part of Bregalnica watershed – Republic of Macedonia, based on digital elevation model and satellite imagery [Paper presentation]. 5th International Conference on Geographic Information Systems (ICGIS), Istanbul, Turkey.8p.
  12. Mirakhorlou, K., & Hosseini, S. Z. (2006). Estimation of rangeland forage yield using satellite data (Case study: Damavand watershed). Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 13(2), 127-138. [in Persian]
  13. Moghimi, E. and Negahban, S. (2012). Basin Erosion Study of Fadami Salt River (Fars Province) by Using Entropy Model. Physical Geography Research, 44(3), 1-16. https://doi: 10.22059/jphgr.2012.29211[in Persian]
  14. Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J. M., Tucker, C. J., & Stenseth, N. C. (2005). Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011
  15. Pordel, F., Ebrahimi, A. and Azizi, Z. (2017). Evaluating of the most suitable vegetation indices of estimating of canopy cover and above-ground phytomass in arid rangelands during different growth periods. Journal of Arid Biome, 7(2), 57-71. https://doi: 10.29252/aridbiom.7.2.57 [in Persian]
  16. Ramezani, Bahman; Ebrahimi, Hoda and Haqparast Mojrdeh, Leila. (2017). The role of natural environment parameters in erosion rate and sediment production by two methods MPSIAC and EPM (Case study: Berenjestanak Dam watershed), Geographical Engineering of the Land, 1(2), 49-59. [in Persian]
  17. Sanaei Nejad, H., Astaraei, A., Mirhosseini, P., Keshavarzi, A., & Ghaemi, M. (2008). Use of satellite images for vegetation cover studies (Comparison of various vegetation indices – Case study: Neyshabur region). Proceedings of the 5th National Congress on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization. [in Persian]
  18. Sadeqzadeh, Reyhan and Yarahmadi, Jamshid. (2018). Evaluation of WEPP model in estimating erosion and sedimentation rate in marly lands of Khajeh region. Quantitative Geomorphological Research 2(1), 97-112. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22519424.1392.2.1.7.6 [in Persian]
  19. Ventura, S. J., & Irvin, B. J. (2000). Automated landform classification methods for soil-landscape studies. Terrain analysis: principles and applications, 267-294.
  20. Weiss, A. (2001). Topographic position and landforms analysis. In Poster presentation, ESRI user conference, San Diego, CA (Vol. 200, p. 2001).
  21. Xiong, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Spatial relationships between NDVI and topographic factors at multiple scales in a watershed of the Minjiang River, China. Ecological Informatics, 69, 101617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101617
  22. Yang, X., Zuo, X., Xie, W., Li, Y., Guo, S., & Zhang, H. (2022). A correction method of NDVI topographic shadow effect for rugged terrain. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 15, 8456-8472. https://doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3193419
دوره 58، شماره 2
تابستان 1405
صفحه 59-78

  • تاریخ دریافت 10 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ بازنگری 09 مرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 12 مرداد 1405