رفتار مشاهداتی و همدیدی باد شمال در سواحل شمال‌غرب خلیج‌فارس: بوشهر، ایران (2010)

نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار دانشکدة علوم و فنون دریایی دانشگاه هرمزگان

2 دانشجوی دکتری فیزیک دریا، دانشکدة علوم و فنون دریایی دانشگاه هرمزگان

3 کارشناسی‌ارشد هواشناسی، دانشکدة علوم و فنون دریایی دانشگاه هرمزگان

چکیده

نسیم دریا- خشکی به‌ منزلة گردش محلی تحت تأثیر واداشت‌های بزرگ و مقیاس جوی است. در این تحقیق تأثیر الگوهای همدیدی باد شمال بر رفتار باد ساحلی در منطقة بوشهر بررسی شده است. الگوی فشاری خاص تراز پایین در فصل‌های گرم و گاهی در فصل‌های سرد، سبب ایجاد میدان باد شمال‌غربی در جنوب ترکیه، عراق و خلیج‌ فارس می‌شود که عامل مهمی در برداشت و انتقال گردوغبار در این مناطق است. این پدیده، الگوی باد ساحلی را تحت تأثیر قرارمی‌دهد و در مواقعی محو می‌کند. مشاهده شد در سال2010 باد شمال تابستانی در ماه‌های می، ژوئن و ژوئیه رخداد بالایی داشته و باد شمال زمستانی در بازة زمانی دسامبر تا مارس و برای چند بازة چندروزه رخ داده است. تأثیر این پدیده بر نسیم دریا- خشکی در منطقة بوشهر با استفاده از داده‌های ایستگاه‌های اندازه‌گیری در منطقة بوشهر و مدل WRF بررسی شده است. در روزهایی که نسیم دریا- خشکی تحت واداشت بادشمال از بین برود، میانگین سرعت وزش باد روزانه بیش از روزهایی‌ است که نسیم دریا- خشکی رخ داده است، به‌طوری‌ که سرعت وزش باد در روزهایی که گردش نسیم دریا- خشکی شکل نمی‌گیرد، حدود 15 تا 18 متر بر ثانیه مشاهده شده است، در حالی‌که میانگین سرعت وزش باد در سایر روزها حدود 8 متر بر ثانیه بوده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Observational and Synoptic Behavior of Shamal Wind in the North West Coast of Persian Gulf: Bushehr, Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hossein Malakooti 1
  • Mohammad Pakhirehzan 2
  • Vajiheh Sadat Hassani 3
1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Marine Sciences and Technologies, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Iran
2 PhD Candidate in Physical Oceanography, Faculty of Marine Sciences and Technologies, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Iran
3 MSc in Meteorology, Faculty of Marine Sciences and Technologies, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Shamal winds recognized as a climate regime with a common occurrence in the Persian Gulf makes periodically adverse weather conditions in this region. Among the phenomena occurring under the influence of Shamal wind, we can mention dust storms, low-level winds and turbulent marine conditions (Rao, 2003). Shamal winds are categorized into two types, winter Shamal and summer Shamal. Sea-land breezes are also classified as a frequent mesoscale and heat driven flow associated with coastal areas. Temperature gradient between sea and land is the main reason for the formation of a sea breeze circulation blowing from sea to land in low level coastal atmospheric boundary layer. The suitable condition for sea-land breezes is when the synoptic winds are weak (low synoptic forcing) and temperature level is high in the coastal city of Bushehr (Bidokhti and Moradi, 2004).
The purpose of this research is to investigate seasonal Shamal wind event and its associated synoptic conditions by observations analysis and numerical experiments on Persian Gulf. The impacts of these conditions on wind pattern are studied in the northwestern Persian Gulf coastal area and in optional case in the coastal area of Bushehr. It is intruded interaction between meteorological mesoscale (sea-land breeze) and large-scale (synoptic pattern Shamal wind) forcing effects in this area.
 
Materials and Methods
Study Area
North part of middle east is dominated by the seasonal Shamal wind regime, that begin from the central deserts of Iraq and the mountains of northern Iraq, Turkey and Syria to Persian Gulf. In this study, the coastal city of Bushehr in the northwest Persian Gulf and southwest Iran have been selected as a case to investigate about interaction of Shamal wind pattern on local breeze on the coastal areas (Figure 1). Based on the location of Bushehr and sea-land breeze definition, it can be said that sea breeze will occur in the sector of 180-270 degree.
 
 
Fig. 1. Coastal case study area
 
 
Basic data
In order to analyze the time series of coastal wind, we used hourly wind speed and direction data from meteorological tower and meteorological station of Bushehr power plant and also wind data from Bushehr airport weather station. The meteorological station of Bushehr power plant is located at 28°59' N and 50°00' E and Bushehr Airport Station is located at 28°58' N and 50°49' E. Both the weather stations are located in a relatively small distance from each other.
In the next step, the NCEP FNL data are used to generate the initial and boundary conditions for regional simulations by WRF model. These data has 1° × 1° resolution and are available for every 6 hours. The data are produced by Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) that continuously receive monitoring global data for analysis from Global Telemetry System (GTS) and other resources. Selected physical schemes for Model setup are represented in table 1:
 
Table 1. Selected physical schemes for WRF model setup





Selected physical scheme


scheme




WSM 6 (Hong et al., 2004)


Microphysics of cloud




Dudhia (Dudhia, 1989)


Radiation of short wavelength




RRTM (Mlawer et al., 1997)


Radiation of long wavelength




NOAH [Chen and Dudhia, 2001; Ek et al., 2003] time interval of summer Shamal


Physics of soil




PX (Pleim and Xiu, 2003)  time interval of winter Shamal




MM5 SLS (Zhang and Anthes, 1982) time interval of summer Shamal


Physics of surface layer




PX (Pleim and  Xiu, 2003) time interval of winter Shamal




YSU [Hong et al., 2006; Hong, 2010] time interval of summer Shamal


Boundary layer




ACM2 (Pleim, 2007), time interval of winter Shamal




Kain-Fristch (Kain and Fristch, 1993; Kain, 2003)


Convection of Cumulus





 
Results and Discussion
The results of the observational time series analysis from the meteorological tower of Bushehr power plant are shown in table 2 for winter (January) and summer (May). These results show the mean detail information of typical wind regimes such as summer and winter Shamal and sea-breeze regimes during January and May, 2010. This table represented formation quality, duration, mean speed, mean direction of sea-breeze wind in the beginning and ending of sea-breeze regimes during these months. It also represented frequency of daily occurrences of typical wind regimes with their mean speed in Bushehr coastal area.
 
Table 2. Specifications of typical wind regimes in Bushehr coastal area during January and May 2010
 





Month


Mean wind direction in the beginning of sea-breeze period


Mean wind direction in the ending time of sea-breeze period


Daily duration of sea-breeze activity (hours)


Pure sea-breeze occurrence (225 °)


Mean wind speed of sea-breeze regime


Mean wind speed during the days without sea-breeze occurrence


Number of the days with Shamal wind activity


Mean wind speed of Shamal wind regime


Shamal wind regime
type




January


269


290


6


no


9 m/s


12.5 m/s


5 days


14 m/s


Winter




May


210


230


9


yes


9 m/s


14 m/s


14 days


14 m/s


Summer





 
Figure 1 represents synoptic condition at 10 pm, 24 June 2010, local time. As it can be seen, the northern Saudi Arabia is influenced by a high pressure system with central pressure around 1012 hPa in this region. As well, on the Persian Gulf a low pressure trough is dominant with 1000 hPa central pressure. In addition, a heat low pressure system is seen over east Iran (region of Afghanistan, Pakistan and etc.). This area is experienced the pressure less than 996 hPa. Turkey, Iraq and west Zagross mountain rang are affected with interaction of these dynamical systems that lead to the creation of Shamal wind in northwest of Persian Gulf.
 
 
Fig. 1. Simulated synoptic maps for 24 June 2010 at 10 pm local time (top left: sea level pressure, top right: 850 hPa, middle left: 700 hPa, middle right: 500 hPa, down left: 300 hPa and downright: 200 hPa)
 
Conclusion
In general, Shamal wind affects Turkey, Iraq, Iran, Arabian Peninsula and adjacent areas. The maximum activity during 2010 was observed in the winter in late January and in the summer in June by maximum number of Shamal. This result is obtained by analysis of the data from the meteorological tower 100 meters high in Bushehr weather station. The summer Shamal caused disruption of coastal wind pattern in 14 days of May, 14 days in June, and about 10 days in July, and usually less than three to five days in other months. Winter Shamal occurs at intervals of 3 to 9 days from December to March. During the period that the sea-breeze is removed by synoptic Shamal winds, the average daily wind speed is more than period of sea-breeze activity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bushehr
  • rose diagram
  • Shamal Wind
  • sea breeze
  • WRF

بیدختی، ع.؛ مرادی، م. (1384). مطالعة مشاهداتی روی نسیم دریا در منطقة بوشهر، نیوار، 56: 7-31.

کمیجانی، ف.؛ نصراللهی، ع.؛ ناهید، ش.؛ نظری، ن. (1391). تحلیل و بررسی الگوی باد سواحل شمالی خلیج فارس بر اساس بادهای نظام‌مند، نسیم دریا و نسیم خشکی، دهمین همایش سواحل، بنادر و سازه‌های دریایی، تهران آذر.

حسنی، و.؛ ملکوتی، ح. (1393). ارزیابی مدل WRF برای شبیه‌سازی لایة مرزی در یک منطقة ساحلی: مطالعة حساسیت به طرحواره‌های پارامترسازی لایة مرزی و سطح زمین، پایان‌نامة کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشگاه هرمزگان.

Al Senai, F.; Anis, A. (2015). Shamals and climate variability in the Northern Persian Gulf from 1973 to 2012, International Journal of Climatology, DOI: 10.1002/joc.4302: 1-20.

Bidokhti, A.; Moradi, M. (2005). An Obsevational Study of Sea Breeze in Bushehr Region, Nivar, 56: 7-31.

Dalu, G.A.; Pielke, R.A. (1989). An Analytical Study of the Sea Breeze, J. Atmos. Sci., 49: 1815-1825.

Dudhia, J. (1989). Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model, J. Atmos. Sci., 46: 3077–3107.

Ek, M.B.; Mitchell, K.E.; Lin, Y.; Rogers, E.; Grunmann, P.; Koren, V.; Gayno, G.; Tarpley, J.D. (2003). Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model. J. Geo. Res., 108(D22), Doi10.1029/2002JD003296.

Giannakopoulou, E.M.; Toumi, R. (2012). The Persian Gulf summertime low-level jet over sloping terrain. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 138: 145–157.

Godske, C.L.; Bergeron, T.; Bjerknes, J.; Bundgaard, R.C. (1957). Dynamic Meteorology and Weather Forecasting, 800 pp., Am. Meteorol.Soc., Boston, Mass.

Hamidi, M.; Kavianpour, M.R.; Shao, Y. (2013). Synoptic Analysis of Dust Storms in the Middle East, Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci., 49(3): 279-286.

Hassani, V.; Malakooti, H. (2014). WRF Model Assessment for PBL Simulates in a Coastal Area: Sensitivity Study to PBL and Surface Physical Parameterizations, M.Sc. thesis, Hormozgan University.

Hong, S. (2010). A new stable boundary-layer mixing scheme and its impact on the simulated East Asian summer monsoon, Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136(651):1481–1496.

Hong, S.; Noh, Y.; Dudhia, J. (2006). A new vertical diffusion package with an explicit treatment of entrainment processes, Mon. Wea. Rev., 134(9): 2318–2341.

Hong, S.; Dudhia, J.; Chen, S.H. (2004). A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of cloud sand precipitation, Mon. Wea. Rev., 132(1): 103–120.

Kain, J.S. (2004). The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: an update, J. Appl. Meteor., 43(1): 170–181.

Kain, J.S.; Fritsch, J.M. (1993).Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The Kain–Fritsch scheme. The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models, Meteorological Monograph, 46: 165–170.

Kamijany, F.; Nasrollahi, A.; Nahid, S.; Nazari, N. (2011). Analysis of Wind regimes on Northern Coast of Persian Gulf, based on systematic winds, sea breeze and land breeze, 10thConferenceon Coasts, Ports and Marine Structures, Tehran.

Mlawer, E.; Taubman, S.; Brown, P.; Lacono, M.; Clough, S. (1997). Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the long-wave, J. Geophys. Res., 102(D14): 16663–16682.

Pleim, J.E. (2007). A combined local and nonlocal closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: Model description and testing, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46: 1383–1395.

Pleim, J.E.; Xiu, A. (2003). Development of a land surface model, Part II: Data Assimilation. J. Appl. Meteor., 42: 1811–1822.

Rao, P.G.; Al-Sulaiti, M.H.; Al-Mulla, M.H. (2001).Winter Shamals in Qatar, Arabian Gulf, Weather, 56: 444451.

Rao, P.G.; Hatwar, H.R.; Al-Sulaiti, M.H.; Al-Mulla, M.H. (2003). Summer Shamals over the Persian Gulf, Weather, 58: 512-523.

Simpson, J.E. (1994). Sea Breeze and Local Wind, 234 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.

Tijm, A.B.C.; VanDelden, A.J. (1999). The role of sound waves in sea-breeze circulatin, Q. J. R. Meteo.Soc., 125: 1997– 2018.

Zhang, D.L.; Anthes, R.A. (1982). A high-resolution model of the planetary boundary layer—Sensitivity tests and comparisons with SESAME-79 data, J. Appl. Meteorol., 21: 1594–1609.

Zhu, M.; Atkinson, B.W. (2004). Observed and Modelled Climatology of the Land–Sea Breeze Circulation over the Persian Gulf, International Journal of Climatology, 24: 883–905.