ارزیابی اثرات تفرج گسترده بر ویژگی‌های محیطی اکوتون‌های هرمزگان

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم جغرافیا، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران

2 گروه مهندسی منابع طبیعی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش ارزیابی اثرات گردشگری غیرمسئولانه بر ویژگی‌های محیطی اکوتون­های هرمزگان است. به این منظور پس از جنگل گردشی، سه منطقه معرف پنج هکتاری با شرایط بدون فشار توریسم، با فشار متوسط و با فشار زیاد توریسم، انتخاب و شاخصه‌های مختلف محیطی اندازه‌گیری شد. در هر منطقه معرف، ده ترانسکت خطی، هر یک شامل دوازده پلات، قرار داده شد. برای اندازه‌گیری فانروفیت‌ها از پلات 20*20 و برای اندازه‌گیری کریپتوفیت‌ها و بوته‌ای‌ها پلات 2*2 مترمربعی، استفاده شد. ده پروفیل خاک نیز بر روی هر ترانسکت، حفر و مقایسه میانگین داده‌ها با آزمون LSD با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SAS 9.1 انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد وزن مخصوص خاک در منطقه گردشگری شدید، افزایش و درصد تخلخل خاک کاهش‌یافته است. همچنین میانگین تاج پوشش گیاهی مربوط به منطقه گردشگری کم (70 درصد) و کمترین آن مربوط به منطقه گردشگری زیاد (1/23 درصد) است. بیشترین وزن مخصوص ظاهری مربوط به منطقه با فشار زیاد گردشگری (79/1 گرم بر سانتی‌متر مکعب) و کمترین آن، مربوط به منطقه گردشگری با فشار کم (24/1 گرم بر سانتی‌متر مکعب) است. بیشترین درصد تخلخل خاک، در منطقه با فشار گردشگری کم، به ترتیب 93/50 و کمترین میزان، در منطقه با فشار گردشگری زیاد 19/32 درصد است. در نهایت افزایش شدت فعالیت‌های گردشگری، باعث تخریب خاک شده و تمامی ویژگی‌های پوشش گیاهی منطقه، شامل تراکم، درصد تاج پوشش گیاهی در بازه زمانی یک سال و ارتفاع گونه‌های درختی، درختچه‌ای و بوته‌ای نیز در اثر افزایش فشار گردشگری زوال یافته است. پیشنهاد می‌گردد ظرفیت برد گردشگری رعایت و فرهنگ‌سازی و آموزش گردشگران انجام گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of the Effects of Extensive Recreation on Vegetation and Soil Ecotone of Hormozgan Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Khadijeh Pourhoseini 1
  • Marzieh Rezai 2
  • Mohamad Akbarian 1
1 Department of Geographical Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Hormozgan, Bandarabbas, Iran
2 Department of Geographical Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Hormozgan, Bandarabbas, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to develop sensitive gully erosion models by implementing a machine learning algorithm (Support Vector Machine and Boosted Regression Tree) in the Moher basin. First, gully areas are identified, and then 13 variables predisposing to gully erosion (Slope, Slope Direction, Topographic Wetness Index, Streem Power Index, Terrain Ruggedness Index, Distance from Waterway, Drainage Density, Distance from Road, Land use, NDVI, Avera annual Rainfall, Geology, and Soil Texture) were selected. The variance inflation coefficient was used to evaluate multicollinearity between variables. Finally, a gully erosion sensitivity map was prepared in the environment (R). Also, the effect of physical and chemical characteristics of soil on gully erosion was investigated using Multivariate Regression. Regarding the importance of variables, Geology has the most significant effect on gully erosion in the SVM model, Land use, and the BRT model. The predicted sensitivity map was validated with the help of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The results showed that the area under the curve (AUC) in the Support Vector Machine and Boosted Regression Tree models were calculated as 0.92 and 0.94, respectively, which led to accurate prediction. Also, the results showed that the sand variable (9.299), sodium absorption ratio (7.967), and TNV (6.185) have the most significant effect on gully erosion
Extended abstract
Introduction
Tourism means voluntarily spending a part of free time with the intention of having fun in a place other than permanent residence (Asadpoor Kordi et all, 2023). The tourism industry has various types and every year, millions of people travel to other parts of the world to visit historical areas, have fun, relax, etc. (Fetres et al, 2022). This industry is one of the fundamental factors of sustainable development (Papali et al, 2006), its impact on the social, economic and cultural development of countries is not hidden from anyone (Godovykh & Ridderstaat, 2020; Gursoy et al., 2019). The development of the tourism industry, in addition to the prosperity of related businesses, such as the prosperity of places of residence, restaurants, the management of resorts and travel agencies, has also caused the attraction of foreign capital and, in other words, foreign exchange, after industrial production, with a share of 3.9 percent, the largest share. In the growth of global gross production (Jordan et al., 2019). In addition to economic, cultural and social benefits, tourism also leaves effects on the natural environment of target areas, which can be positive or negative (Akbarian et al, 2021). The amount of changes and the impact of tourism activities on natural environments is a direct function of the intensity of use and the amount of tourist presence, the stability of the region and the variability of the place (Atic, 2009). Tourism activities have caused a 50% increase in soil compaction, which has resulted in a decrease in the intensity of water infiltration in the soil (Webb & Wilshire, 1983) and finally increases the amount of runoff and leaching of soil minerals (Zhongdong, 2010). Soil washing causes a decrease in the number and activity of soil microorganisms, which in turn will result in a decrease in soil fertility.
 
Materials and methods
GNU Protected Area with an area of 44,598 hectares is located 30 kilometers north of Bandar Abbas in the geographical coordinates of 49, 18, 27 to 28, 29, 27 north latitude and 18, 18, 56 to 5, 57 and 56 (Figure 1). This region has a lot of plant diversity due to its special geographical location and the unique feature of being on the border of the transformation of the vegetation of the Iranian-Turanian region to the Sindhi desert (Rezai et al, 2019).
 
Data collection
The research data includes density and percentage of plant species cover, percentage of litter and soil data of the region. For field studies of vegetation and soil profile digging, three representative areas of 5 hectares, a) without tourism pressure, b) with moderate tourism pressure and c) with high tourism pressure, were selected after GNU circulation forest. These areas were almost similar in terms of geological features, direction and slope percentage, but they were different in terms of the type of tourist presence.
The method of estimating vegetative parameters
The variables included plant characteristics recorded in the sampling plots (percentage of the total vegetation canopy, canopy cover of each species in the plot, percentage of bare soil, percentage of pebbles and percentage of litter) as well as soil profile characteristics of all three representative areas.
- Percentage of canopy cover
After the precise determination of the number of plots and the location of the samples, the desired vegetation factors were collected and measured and recorded in the preliminary forms. For this purpose, gridded plots were used to measure the percentage of vegetation cover. In order to estimate the percentage of plant crown coverage, it is assumed that there is no discontinuity in the inside or umbrella of the plant and the plant space around the crown is in the shape of an umbrella. If the root of the plant is outside the plot and the crown of that plant is inside the plot, the percentage of its coverage will be calculated inside the plot (Zerehi et al, 2022). With this calculation, gridded plots of four-square meters were used, which were divided into four hundred houses of 100 square centimeters and each house represented 0.25% (Figure 4b).
- Number of bases per hectare (density)
Density is defined as the number of individuals of each species per unit area and is one of the best numerical indicators to express the quantitative values of a plant community, especially for evaluating tree and shrub communities (Zerehi et al, 2021). In order to estimate the density, all the bases of plant species in the plots were counted and finally the density per hectare of the species was calculated. Also, the presence and absence of the species (abundance) in the recorded plots, the composition percentage of each species was calculated.
In order to obtain the average diameter of tree and shrub species, assuming that their canopy is spherical, two perpendicular diameters of the plant were measured and then the average diameter of the species was calculated (Figure 4c).
- Methods of measuring physical and chemical properties of soil In order to investigate the impact of ecotourism pressure on the soil, 10 soil profiles were dug to a depth of 40 cm in each tourism representative area (Figure 4d).
 
Results and discussion
The results of vegetation and soil measurements. The findings of soil surface cover characteristics, density and height of plant species in low, medium and high-pressure tourism areas are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The measurement of land surface cover in the three representative areas under investigation showed that the total amount of vegetation cover in the representative area of low-pressure tourism is 70%, medium pressure tourism is 45.3% and high-pressure tourism is 23.1%. Accordingly, the percentage of bare soil in these sites is 6.5, 17.3, and 25.6 respectively, the percentage of litter is 4.5, 2.2, and 1.1, respectively, and the amount of stone and gravel in these three sites is 19, respectively. 35.2 percent (Table 1).
The total density of these species in low pressure tourism area is 16,500, medium pressure tourism is 12,000 and high-pressure tourism is 10,750 plants per hectare.
The results of the research show a significant deterioration of all the characteristics of the vegetation in the GNU region, including the density, canopy percentage and height of tree, shrub and bush species with increasing tourism pressure. Most of the researches have confirmed that plants are affected by recreational activities and it has been proven that there is a negative correlation between the intensity of tourism and the percentage of vegetation cover, plant height and species diversity (Cakir et al., 2010). Some researchers have reported that increasing the number of recreational activities even leads to a decrease in the height of plant species and also reduces the percentage of foliage cover of plant species (Turton, 2005).
 
Conclusion
 In the current research, in terms of height, there is a statistically significant difference between all three tourist areas. The height of different vegetation forms of bushes, trees and shrubs has an inverse relationship with the increase in the intensity of tourism activities, and its average in the low tourism zone is higher than the average of this feature in the medium tourism zone, and it is higher than the height of the vegetation forms in the high tourism zone.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Protected Area
  • Soil
  • Vegetation Cover
  • Extensive Recreation
  1. اسدپور کردی، مریم؛ امیرنژاد، حمید؛ ناصری اوجاکی، سید هادی و شیرزادی لسکوکلایه، سمیه. (1401). بررسی توسعه صنعت گردشگری ایران با تأکید بر کارایی این صنعت. گردشگری و توسعه،11 (1)، 211 - 224. doi: 10.22034/jtd.2021.252734.2151
  2. اکبریان، محمد. (1400). ارزیابی اثرات زیست‌محیطی توسعه ژئوتوریسم در جزیره هرمز. پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمّی، 10(1)، 20-39. doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2021.266888.1248
  3. بخشی، حمید؛ نمیرانیان، منوچهر؛ مخدوم فرخنده، مجید و زاهدی امیری، قوام‌الدین. (1391). تأثیر تفرج بر زادآوری، پوشش علفی و خاک (مطالعه موردی: پارک جنگلی نور)، جنگل و فرآورده‌های چوب. مجله منابع ایران طبیعی، 3 (65)، 271-283. doi: 10.22059/jfwp.2012.30079
  4. ثابتی، حبیب اله. (1387). جنگل‌ها، درختان و درختچه‌های ایران. انتشارات دانشگاه یزد.
  5. رضایی، مرضیه؛ ارزانی، حسین؛ آذرنیوند، حسین؛ نجفی، کیان و مسلمی، حمید. (1398). تعیین شایستگی منطقه حفاظت‌شده برای چرای حیات‌وحش (مطالعه موردی: منطقه حفاظت‌شده گنو). مهندسی اکوسیستم بیابان، 8(25)، 82-67. doi: 10.22052/deej.2018.7.24.35
  6. رضایی، مرضیه؛ ارزانی، حسین؛ آذرنیوند، حسین؛ نجفی، کیان و مهدوی، رسول. (1396). ارزیابی توان مراتع خشک و نیمه‌خشک برای استفاده گردشگری در هرمزگان. نشریه مرتع، 11(1)، 82-73.  dor: 20.1001.1.20080891.1396.11.1.9.6
  7. زبیری، محمود. (1389). آماربرداری جنگل. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  8. زرهی. فاطمه؛ رضائی، مرضیه و مرادی، نوازاله. (1400). تحلیل آماری شکل ژئولوژیک نبکاهای بیابان‌های ساحلی هم‌جوار خلیج‌فارس به‌منظور تثبیت ماسه‌های روان و تغییرات کاربری نبکازارها (مطالعه موردی: هرمزگان، سیریک). پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمّی، 10(2)، 176-196. doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2021.259426.1231
  9. زرهی، فاطمه و رضایی مرضیه. (1401). تغییرات گسترش تپه‌های ماسه‌ای و پوشش سطوح تحت تأثیر سرعت باد در بیابان‌های هم‌جوار اکوسیستم‌های ماندابی. پژوهش‌های فرسایش محیطی، ۱۲ (۱)، ۹۵-۱۱۲. doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2021.259426.1231
  10. شیروانی سرمازه، نازنین؛ جهانی، علی؛ گشتاسب، حمید و اعتماد، وحید. (1396). ارزیابی اثرات اکولوژیک تفرج بر کیفیت خاک و پوشش گیاهی در مناطق تحت حفاظت. مجله منابع طبیعی ایران محیط‌زیست طبیعی، 70 (4)، 881-891. doi: 10.22059/jne.2017.224020.1304
  11. عابدی، رویا. (1398). تأثیر گردشگری طبیعت بر ویژگی‌های ساختار و تنوع زیستی گونه‌های چوبی در اکوسیستم جنگلی (مطالعه موردی: جنگل ارسباران). مجله پژوهش‌های گیاهی (مجله زیست‌شناسی ایران)، 32 (2)، 406-416. Dor: 20.1001.1.23832592.1398.32.2.16.1
  12. قاسم‌زاده، روح‌انگیز؛ اصغری، شکراله؛ کیوان بهجو، فرشاد؛ قنبری، سجاد و قمی معتضه، علیرضا. (1399). بررسی پیامدهای گردشگری بر خصوصیات فیزیکی خاک (مطالعه موردی ذخیره‌گاه جنگلی فندقلو اردبیل). محیط‌زیست طبیعی منابع طبیعی ایران، 73(3)، 557-569. doi: 10.22059/jne.2020.298642.1931
  13. کیوان بهجو، فرشاد؛ زندی اصفهان، احسان و محبوب، بابک. (1395). مطالعه تأثیر فعالیت‌های تفرجی (اکوتوریسم) بر تغییرات خاک در اکوسیستم‌های مرتعی تالش. تحقیقات مرتع و بیابان ایران، 23(2)، 344 -356. doi: 10.22092/ijrdr.2016.107036
  14. گلیچی، الهام؛ حسینی، مسید محسن و کیادلیری، مسعود. (1397). اثر اکوتوریسم بر شاخص‌های تنوع زیستی گیاهی در پارک جنگلی چالدره. فصلنامه علوم و فنون منابع طبیعی، 6(3)، 85-97.
  15. محمدی‌فرد، فریده؛ ملاشاهی، مریم و روانبخش، هومن. (1398). تأثیر اکوتوریسم بر ساختار پوشش گیاهی و تنوع زیستی در پارک جنگلی نور. مجله جنگل ایران، 11(4)، 559-573.
  16. مظفریان، ولی اله. (1389)). درختان و درختچه‌های ایران. انتشارات فرهنگ معاصر.
  17. مؤمنی، معصومه و امینی قشلاقی، سیاوش. (1398). نقش مناطق حفاظت‌شده در توسعه اکوتوریسم (مطالعه موردی پناهگاه حیات‌وحش میانکاله). مجله جغرافیا و روابط انسانی، 2(1)، 370 تا 387. Dor: 20.1001.1.26453851.1398.2.1.24.2
  18. Abedi, R. (2019). The Impact of Nature-Based Tourism on Structure and Biodiversity Characteristics of Arasbaran Forest. Journal of Plant Research (Iranian Journal of Biology)32(2), 406-416. Dor: 20.1001.1.23832592.1398.32.2.16.1 [In Persian].
  19. Akbarian, M. (2021). Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Geotourism Development on Hormuz Island, Iran. Quantitative Geomorphological Research10(1), 20-39. doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2021.266888.1248 [In Persian].
  20. Andres-Abella, M. N., Javier Benayas. D. A. & Landete-Castillejos, T., (2005). Impact of visitors on soil and vegetation of the recreational area Nacimiento Del Mundo (Castilla-Lamancha, Spain). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 101, 55-67.
  21. Asadpourkordi, M., amirnejad, H., Naseri Ojaki, S. H., & Shirzadi Laskookalayeh, S. (2022). Investigating the development of Iran's tourism industry with emphasis on the efficiency of this industry. Journal of Tourism and Development11(1), 211-224. doi: 10.22034/jtd.2021.252734.2151 [In Persian].
  22.  Atic, M., Sayan, S., Karaguzel, O., (2009). Impact of recreational trampling on the natural vegetation in Termessos National Park, Antalya-Turkey.Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001098
  23. Bakhshi, H., Namiranian, M., Makhdoom, M., & Zahedi Amiri, G. (2012). The impact of recreation on regeneration, herbaceous cover and soil quality (A case study: Nour forest park). Forest and Wood Products65(3), 271-283. doi: 10.22059/jfwp.2012.30079 [In Persian].
  24.  Bin, W., Xiaolei, Z., Zhaoping, Y., Heigang, X., & Yang, Q. (2016). Influence of tourist disturbance on soil properties, plant communities, & surface water quality in theTianchi scenic area of Xinjiang, China. J Arid Land, 8(2), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-015-0140-y
  25. Cakir, M., Makineci, E., & Kumbasli, M. (2010). Comparative study on soil properties in a picnic and undisturbed area of Belgard forest, Istanbul. Journal of Environmental Biology, 31, 125- 128.
  26. Choupanian, A., Rezai, M., Mahdavi, R. & Nafarzadegan, A. R., (2023). Application of Land Measurements for Detection the Climate Changes Impact on Vegetation Dynamics, Kermanshah Province, Iran. J of Rangeland Science, 12 (1), 1617.
  27. Foladi, M., Mahdavi Najafabadi, R., Rezai, M., & Moslemi, H. (2021). Development of management strategies for protection and rehabilitation of Jazmourian lagoon using the VIKOR multi-criteria decision model. The Journal of Geographical Research on Desert Areas, 8(2), 107-135.
  28. Galichi, E., Hosseini, S.M., Kiadliri, M. (2017). The effect of ecotourism on plant biodiversity indicators in Chaldereh Forest Park. Natural Resources Sciences and Techniques, 6(3), 85-97.
  29. ghasemzadeh, R., Asghari, S., keyvan behjoo, F., ghanbari, S., & ghomi motazeh, A. (2020). Assessment of the effect of recreational activities on forest soil physical properties (case study: fandoghlou park, Ardabil, Iran). Journal of Natural Environment73(3), 557-569. doi: 10.22059/jne.2020.298642.1931 [In Persian].
  30.  Godovoykh, M., & Ridderstaat, J. (2020). Health outcomes of tourism development: A longitudinal study of the impact of tourism arrivals on resident's health. Journal of Destination marketing & management, 17, 100462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100462
  31. Gursoy, D., Ouyang, Z., Nunkoo R. & Wei W., (2019). Residents' impact perceptions of and attitudes towards tourism development: a meta-analysis. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 28(3), 306-333, https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2018.1516589
  32. Jahani, A., & Saffariha M. (2020). The prediction model of tourism impact assessment in vegetation canopy cover of Qhamishloo National park and Wildlife Refuge. Journal of natural environment (Iranian Journal of natural resources), 73, 257 - 270. [In Persian].
  33.  Jordan, E. J., Spencer, D. M., & Prayyag, G. (2019). Tourism impacts, emotions and stress. Annals of Tourism Research, 75, 213 - 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.01.011
  34. Keivan Behjou, F., Zandi esfahan, E., & Mahboub, B. (2016). The effect of recreational activities (ecotourism) on soil changes in Talesh Rangeland ecosystems. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research23(2), 356-344. doi: 10.22092/ijrdr.2016.107036 [In Persian].
  35. Li, Q., Dai, M., & Luo, F. (2022). Influence of Tourism Disturbance on Soil Microbial Community Structure in Dawei Mountain National Forest Park. Sustainability, 14(3),1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031162
  36. Lucas-Borja, M. E., Bastida, F., Moreno, J. L., Nicolás, C., Andres, M., López, F.R., & Del Cerro, A., (2011). The effects of human trampling on the microbiological properties of soil and vegetation in Mediterranean mountain areas. Land Degrad. Develop, 22, 383-394. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.1014
  37. Mohamadifard, F., Mollashahi, M., & Ravanbakhsh, H. (2020). The impact of ecotourism on vegetation structure and plant diversity of Noor forest park, Iran. Iranian Journal of Forest11(4), 559-573. [In Persian].
  38. Momeni, M., & Imeni Gheshlagh, S. (2019). The role of protected areas in the development of ecotourism (Case Study of Miankaleh Wildlife Refuge Using SWOT Model). Geography and Human Relationships2(1), 369-387. Dor: 20.1001.1.26453851.1398.2.1.24.2 [In Persian].
  39. Mozafarian, V. (2019). Trees and shrubs of Iran. Farhange Moaser Press. [In Persian].
  40.  Niu, L., Cheng, Z. (2019). Impact of tourism disturbance on forest vegetation in Wutai Mountain, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7218-5
  41. Pariente, S., Zhevelev, H.M., (2008). Effect of visitor's pressure on the spatial variability of sandy soil in an urban park in Tel Aviv. Environment Assess, 142, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9906-9
  42. Rezaee M, Arzani H, Azarnivand H, Shabankareh K, Mahdavi Najafabadi R. (2017). Potential evaluation of arid and semi-arid rangelands for ecotourism in Hormozgan. 73-82: 11(1), dor: 20.1001.1.20080891.1396.11.1.9.6 [In Persian].
  43. Rezaei, M., Arzani, H., Azarinvand, H., Najafi Tire Shabankareh, K., & Moslemi, H. (2022). Suitability determining in protected area for wildlife (Case study: Geno protected area). Desert Ecosystem Engineering8(25), 67-82. doi: 10.22052/deej.2018.7.24.35 [In Persian].
  44. Rezai, M., & Abedini, M., (2021). Environmental assessment of mineral development and tourism in the desert islands of the Persian Gulf with regard to their ecological potential. Khoshkboom, 11(1), 135-141. [In Persian].
  45.  Rusterholz, H. P., M. Kissling, & B. Baur, (2009). Disturbance by human trampling alter the performance. Sexual reproduction and genetic diversity in a clonal woodland herb, Perspectives in plant ecology. Evolution and systematics, 8 (2), 109-116.
  46.   Saljuqi, M., Rezaei, M. & Ismailpour, Y., (2023). Monitoring the effect of land use change on soil erosion using satellite data in East Hormozgan, 12 (4), 54-78.
  47. Shang, Q., Liu, Y. & Li, Q. (2022). Effects of tourism trampling on soil nitrogen mineralization in Quercus variabilis Blume forests varies with altitudes in the climate transition zone. Forests, 13,1467. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091467
  48. shirani sarmazeh, N., jahani, A., goshtasb, H., & k, K. (2017). Ecological Impacts Assessment of Recreation on Quality of Soil and Vegetation in Protected Areas (Case Study:Qhamishloo National park and Wildlife Refuge). Journal of Natural Environment70(4), 881-891. doi: 10.22059/jne.2017.224020.1304 [In Persian].
  49. Thabeti, H. (1387). Iran's forests, trees and shrubs. Yazd University Press. [In Persian].
  50.  Turton, S. M., (2005). Managing environmental impacts of recreation and tourism inrainforests at the WetTropics of Queensland World Heritage Area. Geographical Research, 43,140-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2005.00309.x
  51. Webb, R. H. & Wilshire, H. G., (1983). Environmental effects of off-road Svehicles: pimpacts arnd manage ement in arid reggions. Newe York: r -Verlag, 4p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5454-6
  52. Whitecotton, R., David, M., Darmody, R. & Price, D., (2000). Impact of foot traffic from military training on soil and vegetation properties. Environmental anagement, 26(6), 697-706 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670002224
  53. Zerehi, F., & moradi, N. (2021). Statistical analysis of the geological shape of coastal desert nebkas adjacent to the Persian Gulf in order to stabilize quicksands and land use changes of nebkazars (Case study: Hormozgan, Sirik). Quantitative Geomorphological Research10(2), 176-196. doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2021.259426.1231 [In Persian].
  54.  Zhongdong, W. U., (2010). The Study on Impact of Soil Physicochemical Properties and Vegetation by Tourism, The Case of Lushan Forest Park in Shandong Province Zibo City. Shandong University of Technology, Institute of Resources and Environment Engineering, Zibo, China, 15p.
  55. Zubairi, M., (2010). Forest statistics. Tehran University Press. [In Persian].