Assessment of Land Use Changes Based on the Integration of Machine Learning Method and Spectral Angle Mapper Algorithm Using Training Samples Migration: A Case Study of Anzali Wetland Basin

Document Type : Full length article

Authors

1 Department of Water Engineering and Hydraulic Structures, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 (Corresponding Author) Department of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Coastal, Ports and Marine Structures Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran Email: pbadiei@ut.ac.ir

10.22059/jphgr.2025.384462.1007848

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Given the significance of land use changes in spatial planning and the conservation of critical ecosystems such as wetlands, this study aims to analyze land use changes in the Anzali Wetland basin by integrating the Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) algorithm with the Random Forest (RF) classifier, utilizing dynamic training samples within the Google Earth Engine (GEE). For this purpose, harmonized Sentinel-2 imagery from 2019–2023 and six spectral indices were employed to enhance classification accuracy. By collecting 500 ground points in the base year and using spectral angle difference analysis, new training samples were generated for 2021 and 2023, and classification maps were produced using the RF algorithm. The results show that over these five years, the most significant land use changes were a decrease in water bodies and an increase in wetlands and built-up areas. The modeling outcomes demonstrated an overall accuracy and kappa exceeding 87% for the study period. Additionally, the water body class exhibited the highest user and producer accuracy, exceeding 90%. The results of the relative importance of bands and indices also highlight their role in enhancing the accuracy of the generated maps. It was found that the green, blue, and red bands, along with the MNDWI, had the greatest effect on land use discrimination and the transfer of training samples. Based on the research findings, the hybrid method, incorporating dynamic sampling and automated sample generation, can effectively improve the accuracy of land use classification in wetlands. Therefore, it is a reliable and applicable method for future studies in other wetland basins.
Wetlands are among the most significant aquatic bodies that interact with both natural and human ecosystems, providing diverse ecosystem services. Over the past century, more than half of the world's wetlands have disappeared, despite their ecological significance. Anzali International Wetland, which is listed under the Ramsar Convention, is one of the wetlands experiencing degradation due to stress factors such as climate change and human activities. These pressures have resulted in a decline in both the quantity and quality of its water body, leading to habitat loss and environmental deterioration. Understanding and analyzing land use changes in the watershed draining into the wetland, combined with spatial planning and environmental management, can help to mitigate wetland degradation.
Thanks to the progress in satellite sensor technology, the assessment of land use changes has become increasingly feasible, offering significant time and cost savings compared to traditional methods. However, selecting an efficient classification method and ensuring its accuracy remain critical challenges. A review of previous studies indicates that although supervised classification techniques generally outperform other methods, no universally optimal approach has yet been identified for accurately classifying land use in wetland watersheds. Furthermore, while the Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud platform offers distinct advantages over software like ENVI, it has been underutilized in wetland studies. Additionally, newer integrated approaches, such as combining machine learning algorithms with the Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) method—designed to detect spectral differences between land cover types—have not been specifically applied to monitoring wetland changes.
Another limitation of previous studies is the uniform approach to training sample collection, which is typically conducted manually through multiple ground-truth surveys. The classification models in these studies rely on predefined land use labels, potentially limiting adaptability. To address these gaps, this study, for the first time, utilizes a time series of harmonized Sentinel-2 imagery with a 10-meter resolution to assess land use changes in the Anzali Wetland watershed. Moreover, it is the first study to implement a new hybrid methodology on this platform by integrating the SAM algorithm with the Random Forest machine learning classifier, incorporating dynamic training samples to automatically generate land use classification maps for target years based on a base-year map. Additionally, the study evaluates the relative importance of spectral bands and indices to determine their contribution to land use classification within the study area.
 
Methodology
Summer season data (2019–2023) for the Fumanat sub-watershed were collected using the GEE platform and harmonized Sentinel-2 imagery. To enhance land use class separability, various spectral indices and bands were incorporated into the dataset. A total of 500 reference data points for the base-year map (2019) were sampled via Google Earth, corresponding to different land use classes. Subsequently, the SAM algorithm was applied alongside reference data, preprocessed base-year and target-year (2021 and 2023) images, and spectral angle calculations for land use classes to generate new training samples for the target yearsOf these samples, 70% were utilized for training the Random Forest model, while the remaining 30% were used for accuracy assessment based on overall accuracy, kappa coefficient, and other validation metrics. Finally, the relative importance of spectral bands and indices was evaluated based on their impact on classification performance.
 
Results and discussion
The results indicate that the new hybrid approach enhances the accuracy of land use classification maps in complex environments compared to previous methods. The mean values of overall accuracy and kappa coefficient demonstrate a high classification accuracy exceeding 85%. Furthermore, since the user’s and producer’s accuracy for all land use classes remained above 70%, confirming reliable training sample transfer and effective class separability. Additionally, the transfer of the training sample and the automated model training helped minimize human-induced errors in sample collection. The estimated land use area and percentage of changes over the study period revealed a 43% increase in built-up areas, while the Anzali Wetland water body experienced a decline of more than 28%. Analyzing the importance of spectral bands showed that in 2019, the red band had the highest effect on classification accuracy and sample transfer, while in 2021, the blue band played a more significant role. In 2023, the Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI) proved to be the most influential factor in distinguishing land use classes and optimizing sample transfer accuracy.
 
Conclusion
The application of the SAM algorithm and spectral angle analysis between the base image and target images facilitates the automated generation of dynamic training samples. This approach significantly enhances the separability of land cover features in classification mapping, particularly in environments with high land use complexity and diversity, such as wetlands, compared to static training sample selection. Additionally, integrating this method with the Random Forest classifier improves model accuracy in land use classification. The observed land use change trends in the study area highlight the urgent need for conservation as well as sustainable restoration initiatives for Anzali Wetland, one of Iran’s and the world's most critical ecosystems. Therefore, it is recommended to conduct ecological capacity assessments and implement governance-based policies with the participation of stakeholders to ensure informed decision-making. Furthermore, revising spatial planning strategies and shifting economic policies that promote urban and industrial expansion should be prioritized to enhance the resilience of vulnerable resources such as Anzali Wetland. These measures are essential for halting its degradation and initiating long-term restoration initiatives.
 
Funding
This work is based upon research funded by Iran National Science Foundation (INFS) under project No. 4033513

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Allahyari MS, Marzban S, Gonzalez-Ollauri A, et al. (2024). Unlocking the power of public awareness: paving the way for sustainable wetland management in Anzali, Iran. Frontiers in environmental science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1277154
  2. Aziz, G., Minallah, N., Saeed, A., Frnda, J., & Khan, W. (2024). Remote sensing-based forest cover classification using machine learning. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50863-1
  3. Benzougagh, B., Gajbhiye Meshram, S., El Fellah, B., Mastere, M., El Basri, M., Ouchen, I., Sadkaoui, D., Bammou, Y., Moutaoikil, N., & Turyasingura, B. (2023). Mapping of land degradation using spectral angle mapper approach (SAM): the case of Inaouene watershed (Northeast Morocco). Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. 10, 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01711-8
  4. Berkessa, Y. W., Bulto, T. W., Moisa, M. B., Gurmessa, M. M., Werku, B. C., Juta, G. Y., Gemeda, D. O., & Negash, D. A. (2023). Impacts of urban land use and land cover change on wetland dynamics in Jimma city, southwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 14(7), 2397–2415. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2023.102
  5. Berlanga-Robles, C. A., & Ruiz-Luna, A. (2020). Assessing seasonal and long-term mangrove canopy variations in Sinaloa, northwest Mexico, based on time series of enhanced vegetation index (EVI) data. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 28(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-020-09709-0
  6. Berra, E. F., Fontana, D. C., Yin, F., & Breunig, F. M. (2024). Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 Data with Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing, 16(15), 2695–2695. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16152695
  7. Chen, F., Chen, X., Van, T., Roberts, D. A., Jiang, H., & Xu, W. (2020). Open water detection in urban environments using high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 242, 111706–111706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111706
  8. Chen, Q., Zhong, C., Jing, C., Li, Y., Cao, B., & Cheng, Q. (2021). Rapid Mapping and Annual Dynamic Evaluation of Quality of Urban Green Spaces on Google Earth Engine. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(10), 670–670. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10100670
  9. Chundu, M. L., Banda, K., Lyoba, C., Tembo, G., Sichingabula, H. M., & Nyambe, I. A. (2024). Modeling Land Use/Land Cover Changes Using Quad Hybrid Machine Learning Model in Bangweulu Wetland and Surrounding Areas, Zambia. Environmental Challenges, 100866–100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.100866
  10. Congalton, RG. (1991). A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-b
  11. Fazel Dehkordi, L., Azarnivand, H., Zare Chahouki, M. A., Mahmoudi Kohan, F., & Khalighi Sigaroudi, S. (2016). Drought Monitoring Using Vegetation Index (NDVI) (Case study: Rangelands of Ilam Province). Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 69(1), 141-154. doi: 10.22059/jrwm.2016.61739 [In Persian].
  12. Firouzi, F., Tavosi, T., & Mahmoudi, P. (2019). Investigating the sensitivity of NDVI and EVI vegetation indices to dry and wet years in arid and semi-arid regions (Case study: Sistan plain, Iran). Scientific- Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), 28(110), 163-179. doi: 10.22131/sepehr.2019.36621 [In Persian].
  13. Ghorbanian, A., Kakooei, M., Amani, M., Mahdavi, S., Mohammadzadeh, A., & Hasanlou, M. (2020). Improved land cover map of Iran using Sentinel imagery within Google Earth Engine and a novel automatic workflow for land cover classification using migrated training samples. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 167, 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.07.013
  14. Hemmesy, M. S., Yarahmadi, D., Ownegh, M. & Shamsipour, A. A. (2019). Evaluation of Landuse Changes with Emphasis on Green Land Use Planning in Kashan Plain Watershed. Physical Geography Research51(4), 613-632. doi: 10.22059/jphgr.2019.267865.1007288 [In Persian].
  15. Huang, H., Wang, J., Liu, C., Liang, L., Li, C., & Gong, P. (2020). The migration of training samples towards dynamic global land cover mapping. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 161, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.01.010
  16. Jamal, S., & Ahmad, W. S. (2020). Assessing land use land cover dynamics of wetland ecosystems using Landsat satellite data. SN Applied Sciences, 2(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03685-z
  17. Mahdian, M., Hosseinzadeh, M., Siadatmousavi, SM., et al. (2023). Modelling impacts of climate change and anthropogenic activities on inflows and sediment loads of wetlands: case study of the Anzali Wetland. scientific reports, 13, 5399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32343-8
  18. Mitsch, W. J., & Gosselink, J. G. (2015). Wetlands. edition5. Publisher: Wiley.
  19. Mohammadi, P., Ebrahimi, K., & Bazrafshan, J. (2023). Investigation of land use changes in Gorganrood catchment using Google Earth Engine platform. Iranian Journal of Watershed Management Science and Engineering, 17 (60), 2. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20089554.1402.17.60.1.3 [In Persian].
  20. Mulatu, K., Hundera, K., & Senbeta, F. (2024). Analysis of land use/ land cover changes and landscape fragmentation in the Baro-Akobo Basin, Southwestern Ethiopia. Heliyon, 10(7), e28378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28378
  21. Naderi. M., Saatsaz, M. (2020). Impact of climate change on the hydrology and water salinity in the Anzali Wetland, northern Iran. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 65, 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1704761
  22. Rooki, Z., Mohammadi, H. and zandi, R. (2023). The Role of Land Use Changes in Shaping Surface Temperature in Cities: A Case Study of Isfahan". Physical Geography Research, 55(3), 1-17 doi: 10.22059/jphgr.2023.361681.1007779 [In Persian].
  23. Sadeghi Pasvisheh, R., Anne, M., Ho, L. T., & Goethals, P. (2021). Evidence-Based Management of the Anzali Wetland System (Northern Iran) Based on Innovative Monitoring and Modeling Methods. Sustainability, 13(10), 5503–5503. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105503
  24. Salas, E.A.L., Subburayalu, S.K., Slater, B., Dave, R., Parekh, P., Zhao, K., Bhattacharya, B. (2021). Assessing the effectiveness of ground truth data to capture landscape variability from an agricultural region using Gaussian simulation and geostatistical techniques. Heliyon, 7(7), e07439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07439
  25. Shakeri, R., shayesteh, K., & ghorbani, M. (2019). Assessment and prediction of land use changes in the Anzali wetland Basin, Based on Land Change Modeler (LCM). Iranian Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS, 11(2), 93-114. doi: 10.52547/gisj.11.2.93 [In Persian].
  26. Sharma, M., Bangotra, P., Gautam, A. S., & Gautam, S. (2021). Sensitivity of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to land surface temperature, soil moisture and precipitation over district Gautam Buddh Nagar, UP, India. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 36, 1779–1789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02066-1
  27. Shimabukuro, Y. E., Arai, E., Gabriel, Hoffmann, T. B., Duarte, V., Martini, P. R., Dutra, A. C., Guilherme, Godinho, L., & Adami, M. (2023). Mapping Land Use and Land Cover Classes in São Paulo State, Southeast of Brazil, Using Landsat-8 OLI Multispectral Data and the Derived Spectral Indices and Fraction Images. Forests, 14(8), 1669–1669. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14081669
  28. Som-ard, J., Immitzer, M., Vuolo, F., Ninsawat, S., & Atzberger, C. (2022). Mapping of crop types in 1989, 1999, 2009 and 2019 to assess major land cover trends of the Udon Thani Province, Thailand. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 198, 107083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107083
  29. Tajadod, M. J., Haghighi Khomami, M., Modaberi, H., & Panahandeh, M. (2024). Integrating Sentinel 1 and 2 Satellite Data with Spectral Indices to Improve Classification Methods (Anzali Wetland). Environmental Sciences, 22(3), 389-406. doi: 10.48308/envs.2024.1353 [In Persian].
  30. Tarrio, K., Tang, X., Masek, J. G., Claverie, M., Ju, J., Qiu, S., Zhu, Z., & Woodcock, C. E. (2020). Comparison of cloud detection algorithms for Sentinel-2 imagery. Science of Remote Sensing, 2, 100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2020.100010
  31. Tonidandel, S., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011). Relative Importance Analysis: A Useful Supplement to Regression Analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9204-3
  32. Xie, H., Sun, Q., & Song, W. (2024). Exploring the Ecological Effects of Rural Land Use Changes: A Bibliometric Overview. Land, 13(3), 303–303. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13030303
  33. Xiong, Y., Mo, S., Wu, H., Qu, X., Liu, Y., & Zhou, L. (2023). Influence of human activities and climate change on wetland landscape pattern—A review. Science of the Total Environment, 879, 163112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163112