شناسایی رژیم اقلیمی حوضه دریای خزر با رویکرد داده کاوی: رهیافتی برای کشاورزی پایدار و سازگاری با تغییر اقلیم

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل

نویسندگان

1 گروه ریاضی کاربردی، دانشکده ریاضی و علوم کامپیوتر، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران

2 گروه علوم کامپیوتر، دانشکده ریاضی و علوم کامپیوتر، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران

10.22059/jphgr.2026.406953.1007911

چکیده

حوضه دریای خزر به دلیل نقش برجسته‌اش در تأمین امنیت غذایی، توسعه اقتصادی و پایداری زیست‌محیطی کشور، یکی از مناطق حساس در برابر تغییرات اقلیمی محسوب می‌شود. ناهمواری‌های توپوگرافی، تنوع پوشش زمین و مجاورت با پهنه آبی وسیع، موجب شکل‌گیری الگوهای پیچیده و ناهمگن آب و هوایی در این حوضه گردیده است. ازاین‌رو، شناسایی دقیق ساختارهای فضایی‑زمانی اقلیم در این منطقه، گامی ضروری برای مدیریت سازگار با اقلیم و برنامه‌ریزی منابع آب و کشاورزی به شمار می‌رود. پژوهش حاضر با بهره‌گیری از رویکردی ترکیبی شامل کاهش ابعاد (تحلیل مؤلفه‌های اصلی) و خوشه‌بندی (K-میانگین و DBSCAN)، به کشف الگوهای پنهان اقلیمی پرداخته است. داده‌های باز تحلیل اِرا ۵ در بازه ۱۹۶۴ تا ۲۰۲۴ و هفت شاخص کلیدی اقلیمی (دما، بارش، رطوبت، فشار سطح دریا و غیره) به عنوان ورودی مدل استفاده شدند. ابتدا تحلیل مؤلفه‌های اصلی، ویژگی‌های غالب اقلیمی را استخراج و ابعاد داده را کاهش داد. سپس الگوریتم‌های خوشه‌بندی، حوضه را به زیرمنطقه‌های متمایز تفکیک کردند که به‌وضوح تأثیر گرادیان عرض جغرافیایی، ارتفاع از سطح دریا و فاصله از ساحل را نشان می‌دهند. اعتبارسنجی با شاخص‌های سیلوئت و دیویس-بولدین و آزمون تحلیل واریانس، معناداری آماری تمایز این خوشه‌ها را تأیید کرد. افزون بر این، تحلیل همبستگی با شاخص‌های اِنزو آشکار ساخت که فاز ال‌نینو با گرم‌تر و مرطوب‌تر شدن نیمه جنوبی حوضه همراه است؛ درحالی‌که فاز لانینا، شرایط سردتر و خشک‌تری را در بخش‌های شمالی تشدید می‌کند. یافته‌های این پژوهش می‌تواند به عنوان چارچوبی تحلیلی برای ناحیه‌بندی اقلیمی، پایش ریسک‌های جوی، بهینه‌سازی تقویم کشاورزی و مدیریت پایدار منابع طبیعی در حوضه خزر مورداستفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying the Climate Regimes of the Caspian Sea Basin Through a Data-Driven Approach: A Pathway to Sustainable Agriculture and Climate Change Adaptation

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahboubeh Molavi-Arabshahi 1
  • Ali Zali 2
  • Alireza Khadem Daghigh 2
1 Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT
The Caspian Sea basin is considered one of the regions sensitive to climate change due to its prominent role in ensuring Iran’s food security, economic development, and environmental sustainability. Topographic irregularities, land cover diversity, and proximity to a vast water body have led to the formation of complex and heterogeneous climatic patterns within this basin. Therefore, the precise identification of spatiotemporal climate structures in this region is an essential step toward climate-adaptive management and the planning of water and agricultural resources. This study employs a mixed-methods analytical framework, integrating principal component analysis (PCA) for dimension reduction with K-means and DBSCAN (Density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise) clustering techniques, in order to reveal latent climatic patterns. ERA5 reanalysis data from 1964 to 2024, along with seven key climatic indicators, were used as inputs to the model. Initially, principal component analysis extracted the dominant climatic features and reduced the dimensionality of the data. Subsequently, clustering algorithms divided the basin into distinct subregions that clearly demonstrate the influence of latitudinal gradient, elevation above sea level, and distance from the coast. Validation utilizing the silhouette and Davies–Bouldin indices, along with analysis of variance (ANOVA), confirmed the statistical significance of the distinction among these clusters. Furthermore, correlation analysis with ENSO indices (El Niño–Southern Oscillation and the Southern Oscillation Index) revealed that the El Niño phase is associated with warmer and wetter conditions in the southern half of the basin, whereas the La Niña phase exacerbates colder and drier conditions in the northern parts. The findings serve as an analytical framework for climate zoning, monitoring atmospheric risks, optimizing agricultural calendars, and sustainable management of natural resources in the Caspian basin.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The Caspian Sea basin, as the largest enclosed body of water in the world, plays an essential role in ensuring food security, preserving biodiversity, and supporting agricultural and industrial activities in the adjacent countries. However, in recent decades, this unique ecosystem has come under increasing hydroclimatic pressures, including marine heatwaves, water level fluctuations, shoreline erosion, eutrophication, and the accumulation of heavy metals. The complex topographic structure and significant climatic contrasts within this basin, together with its high sensitivity to global atmospheric systems such as the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), have given rise to spatiotemporal heterogeneities that traditional classification systems (e.g., Köppen–Geiger) are unable to fully represent. Prior studies have chiefly relied on linear and station-based statistical methods or classical classifications, and there exists a significant methodological gap in identifying homogeneous climatic regimes based on multidimensional data without structural assumptions at the scale of the entire basin. Consequently, this study aims to employ a hybrid data mining framework to identify homogeneous climatic regions, investigate the influence of ENSO phases on their stability, and provide practical applications for sustainable agriculture and water resource management in the Caspian Sea basin.
 
Methodology
This study utilizes ERA5 reanalysis data with a spatial resolution of approximately 31 kilometers for the period 1964 to 2024, concentrating on the months of September to November. Seven key climatic variables were employed, including air temperature at 2 meters above ground, dew point temperature, wind components (U and V) at 10 meters above ground, surface pressure, mean sea level pressure, and total cloud cover. Furthermore, ENSO indices, encompassing ENSO and the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), were obtained from the Climate Prediction Center of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the United States. The data were normalized via the min-max method, and geographic coordinates (longitude and latitude) were added to the feature vector to enhance spatial coherence. PCA was applied to reduce dimensionality and eliminate correlations, and the four principal components were retained that accounted for more than 78% of the data variance. In the clustering stage, the DBSCAN algorithm (with parameters ε = 0.9 and MinPts = 50) was first applied to remove noisy points (approximately 12% of the data), and its output was then transferred as the initial input to the k-means algorithm. Clustering quality was assessed using the silhouette index (coefficient of 0.65), the Davies–Bouldin index (0.58), as well as MSE and EAI indices. The statistical validity of the clusters was confirmed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the chi-square test to examine the association with ENSO. Additionally, a 3×3 modal filter was applied for spatial smoothing and to enhance spatial continuity.
 
Results and Discussion
The hybrid DBSCAN-K-means framework successfully identified nine climatically distinct and physically meaningful regions across the Caspian Sea basin. The optimal number of clusters was determined by maximizing the silhouette coefficient (0.65) and minimizing the Davies–Bouldin index. The Analysis of variance confirmed significant differences among the clusters in terms of 2-meter temperature and surface pressure (p < 0.001). The spatial pattern of the clusters is clearly governed by latitudinal and elevational gradients: the northern clusters (including the Caucasus and adjacent highlands) exhibit average autumn temperatures of 10–12°C, whereas the southern and southeastern clusters experience temperatures approaching 20°C. Based on their dominant climatic characteristics, these nine clusters can be aggregated into three physical types: northern-mountainous (characterized by lower summer temperatures, higher surface pressure, and stable snow cover); coastal-humid (characterized by thermal moderation due to the sea, high relative humidity, and greater cloud cover); and inland-semi-arid (characterized by higher summer temperatures, distance from moisture sources, and intensified evaporative processes). Seasonal variability analysis indicates that the northern clusters show a high annual thermal range (cold winters and hot summers), whereas the coastal clusters display a more moderate seasonal cycle. The analysis of the association with ENSO revealed that during the El Niño (warm) phase, the frequency of warmer clusters in the southern half of the basin upsurges, with positive temperature anomalies of 1–2°C observed, while during the La Niña (cold) phase, the cold northern clusters expand and lead to the intensification of frost events. The chi-square test confirmed a significant relationship between ENSO phases and the frequency of climatic zones (p < 0.01).
 
Conclusions
This study, by mixing unsupervised machine learning algorithms with ERA5 reanalysis data, successfully identified nine homogeneous climatic zones in the Caspian Sea basin, reflecting the complex atmosphere–ocean and topographic interactions. Statistical validation confirmed the high internal coherence and significant differentiation of these zones. The analysis of the ENSO effect demonstrated that El Niño is associated with the expansion of warm and humid conditions in the south, whereas La Niña is associated with the intensification of cold and dry patterns in the north. From a practical perspective, the findings can serve as a basis for designing adaptive cropping calendars, optimizing water resource allocation at the sub-basin scale, and developing early warning systems for climate hazards. The proposed framework supports the transition from traditional static planning to dynamic, climate-adaptive planning in the Caspian Sea basin. It is recommended that forthcoming research studies incorporate additional variables such as soil moisture, actual evapotranspiration, and socio-economic indicators into the model, so that more comprehensive decision support systems can be developed for resilience to climate change.
 
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
 
Authors’ Contribution
Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved thecontent of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work declaration of competing interest none.
 
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Climate classification
  • atmospheric risks
  • hybrid clustering
  • spatiotemporal patterns
  1. حاجی الیاسی، علی؛ ناصری، محسن و بدیعی، سید پیمان. (1403). ارزیابی تغییرات کاربری اراضی بر مبنای تلفیق روش یادگیری ماشین و الگوریتم نقشه‌بردار زاویه طیفی با استفاده از نمونه‌های آموزشی متغیر، مطالعه موردی: حوضه آبریز تالاب انزلی. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای طبیعی، 56(4)، 39-56. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2025.384462.1007848
  2. حیدری، سوسن؛ کریمی، مصطفی؛ عزیزی، قاسم و شمسی‌پور، علی‌اکبر. (1403). خوشه‌های مکانی و روند تغییرات نواحی هم رخداد خشک‌سالی در ایران. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای طبیعی، 56(1)، 83-101.
  3. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2024.374275.1007820
  4. نگهبان، سعید و مرحمت، مهری. (1404). تهیه نقشه حساسیت سیل در حوزه شهری اقلید با استفاده از الگوریتم‌های یادگیری ماشینی. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای طبیعی، 57(3)، 43-62. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2025.406510.1007909
  5. سلطانی گردفرامرزی، سمیه و عسکری زاده، مژگان. (1403). کاربرد تئوری آنتروپی و تحلیل مؤلفه اصلی جهت تعیین متغیرهای ورودی تخمین تابش خورشیدی با الگوریتم‌های یادگیری ماشین. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای طبیعی، 56(4)، 73-87. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2025.386916.1007858
  6. Aguilar Colmenero, J. L., & Portela Garcia-Miguel, J. (2024). A Regionalization Approach Based on the Comparison of Different Clustering Techniques. Applied Sciences, 14(22), 10563. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210563
  7. Arpe, K., Molavi‐Arabshahi, M., & Leroy, S. A. G. (2020). Wind variability over the Caspian Sea, its impact on Caspian seawater level and link with ENSO. International Journal of Climatology, 40(14), 6039-6054. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6564
  8. Beck, H., Zimmermann, N., McVicar, T. et al. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci Data 5, 180214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214 ‌
  9. Bohluly, A., Esfahani, F. S., Namin, M. M., & Chegini, F. (2018). Evaluation of wind induced currents modeling along the Southern Caspian Sea. Continental Shelf Research, 153, 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2017.12.008 ‌
  10. Carvalho, M. J., Melo-Gonçalves, P., Teixeira, J. C., & Rocha, A. (2016). Regionalization of Europe based on a K-Means Cluster Analysis of the climate change of temperatures and precipitation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts a/b/c, 94, 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2016.05.001
  11. Dehghani, M., Salehi, S., Mosavi, A., Nabipour, N., Shamshirband, S., & Ghamisi, P. (2020). Spatial Analysis of Seasonal Precipitation over Iran: Co-Variation with Climate Indices. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020073 ‌
  12. Doan, Q. V., Amagasa, T., Pham, T. H., Sato, T., Chen, F., & Kusaka, H. (2023). Structural k-means (S k-means) and clustering uncertainty evaluation framework (CUEF) for mining climate data. Geoscientific Model Development, 16(8), 2215-2233. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2215-2023
  13. Duan, H., Li, Q., He, L., Zhang, J., An, H., Ali, R., & Vazifedoust, M. (2024). Climate Classification for Major Cities in China Using Cluster Analysis. Atmosphere, 15(7), 741. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15070741 ‌
  14. Fendereski, F., Vogt, M., Payne, M. R., Lachkar, Z., Gruber, N., Salmanmahiny, A., & Hosseini, S. A. (2014). Biogeographic classification of the Caspian Sea. Biogeosciences, 11(22), 6451-6470. ‌ https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6451-2014
  15. Grigorieva, E., Livenets, A., & Stelmakh, E. (2023). Adaptation of Agriculture to Climate Change: A Scoping Review. Climate, 11(10), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11100202 ‌
  16. Haji Elyasi, Ali, Nasseri, Mohsen, & Badiei, Peyman. (1403). Evaluation of land use changes based on integration of machine learning method and spectral angle mapper algorithm using variable training samples, case study: Anzali Wetland catchment area. Physical Geography Research, 56(4), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2025.384462.1007848 [In Persian]
  17. Heidari, Susan, Karimi, Mostafa, Azizi, Ghasem, & Shamsipour, Ali Akbar. (1403). Spatial clusters and trend of drought co-occurrence regions in Iran. Physical Geography Research, 56(1), 83-101. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2024.374275.1007820 [In Persian]
  18. Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz‐Sabater, J., ... & Thépaut, J. N. (2020). The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quarterly journal of the royal meteorological society, 146(730), 1999-2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803 ‌
  19. Ibrayev, R. A., Özsoy, E., Schrum, C., & Sur, H. I. (2010). Seasonal variability of the Caspian Sea three-dimensional circulation, sea level and air-sea interaction. Ocean Science, 6(1), 311-329. ‌ https://doi.org/10.5194/os-6-311-2010
  20. Khoshravan, H. (2007). Beach sediments, morphodynamics, and risk assessment, Caspian Sea coast, Iran. Quaternary International, 167, 35-39. ‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2007.02.014
  21. Koriche, S. A., Nandini‐Weiss, S. D., Prange, M., Singarayer, J. S., Arpe, K., Cloke, H. L., ... & Coe, M. (2021). Impacts of variations in caspian sea surface area on catchment‐scale and large‐scale climate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(18), e2020JD034251. ‌ https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034251
  22. Lahijani, H., Leroy, S. A. G., Arpe, K., & Cretaux, J. F. (2023). Caspian Sea level changes during instrumental period, its impact and forecast: A review. Earth-Science Reviews, 241, 104428. ‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104428
  23. Lasantha, V., Oki, T., & Tokuda, D. (2022). Data‐Driven versus Köppen–Geiger Systems of Climate Classification. Advances in Meteorology, 2022(1), 3581299. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3581299
  24. Lee, D., Oh, K., & Jung, S. (2019). Classifying Urban Climate Zones (UCZs) Based on Spatial Statistical Analyses. Sustainability, 11(7), 1915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071915
  25. McGregor, S., Cassou, C., Kosaka, Y., & Phillips, A. S. (2022). Projected ENSO teleconnection changes in CMIP6. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(11), e2021GL097511. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097511
  26. Milly, P. C., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R. M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Stouffer, R. J. (2008). Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?. Science, 319(5863), 573-574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915
  27. Molavi-Arabshahi, M., Arpe, K., & Leroy, S. A. G. (2015). Precipitation and temperature of the southwest Caspian Sea region during the last 55 years: their trends and teleconnections with large-scale atmospheric phenomena. International journal of climatology. ‌ http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.4483
  28. Molavi-Arabshahi, M., Azizpour, J., Nikan, O., Naderi Beni, A., & Lopes, A. M. (2023). Investigation and Analysis of Sea Surface Temperature and Precipitation of the Southern Caspian Sea Using Wavelet Analysis. Axioms, 12(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12010010
  29. Mtupili, M., Wang, R., Li, L., & Chen, H. (2025). Critical Role of Spring Snowmelt on Soil Moisture Retention during Meteorological Droughts in the Mid-and High Latitudes of Eurasia. Journal of Climate, 38(20), 5941-5953. ‌ https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-24-0740.1
  30. Najafi, M. S., & Alizadeh, O. (2023). Climate zones in Iran. Meteorological Applications, 30(5), e2147. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.2147
  31. Nasrollahzadeh, H. S., Din, Z. B., Foong, S. Y., & Makhlough, A. (2008). Trophic status of the Iranian Caspian Sea based on water quality parameters and phytoplankton diversity. Continental Shelf Research, 28(9), 1153-1165. ‌ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.02.015
  32. Negahban, Saeed, & Marhamat, Mehri. (1404). Flood susceptibility mapping in Eqlid urban area using machine learning algorithms. Physical Geography Research, 57(3), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2025.406510.1007909 [In Persian]
  33. Parang, H., & Esmaeilbeigi, M. (2022). Total mercury concentration in the muscle of four mostly consumed fish and associated human health risks for fishermen and non-fishermen families in the Anzali Wetland, Southern Caspian Sea. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 52, 102270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2022.102270
  34. Raziei, T. (2022). Climate of Iran according to Köppen-Geiger, Feddema, and UNEP climate classifications: T. Raziei. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 148(3), 1395-1416. ‌ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-03992-y
  35. Sadeghi, H., Mohammadi, H., Shamsipour, A. A. and Karimi, M. (2023). Climatic Zoning of the Southern Coastline of the Caspian Sea Using Multivariate Statistical Methods. Geography and Environmental Planning, 34(2), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2022.127922.1409
  36. Samant, R., & Prange, M. (2023). Climate-driven 21st century Caspian Sea level decline estimated from CMIP6 projections. Communications Earth & Environment, 4(1), 357. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01017-8
  37. Sathiaraj, D., Huang, X., & Chen, J. (2019). Predicting climate types for the Continental United States using unsupervised clustering techniques. Environmetrics, 30(4), e2524. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2524
  38. Schlutow, A., & Schröder, W. (2021). Rule-based classification and mapping of ecosystem services with data on the integrity of forest ecosystems. Environmental Sciences Europe, 33(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00481-3
  39. Serykh, I., Krasheninnikova, S., Safarov, S., Safarov, E., Oskouei, E. A., Gorbunova, T., ... & Falamarzi, Y. (2025). Near-Surface Temperature Climate Change in the Caspian Region: A Study Using Meteorological Station Data, Reanalyses, and CMIP6 Models. Climate, 13(10), 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13100201
  40. Shahkouei, E. I. (1999). Climatic Classification of the East of the Gorgan Plain. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), 8(29), 58-64. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25883860.1378.8.29.12.9
  41. Soltani-GerdFaramarzi, Somayeh, & AskariZadeh, Mojgan. (1403). Application of entropy theory and principal component analysis to determine input variables for solar radiation estimation using machine learning algorithms. Physical Geography Research, 56(4), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2025.386916.1007858 [In Persian]
  42. Tuel, A., & Martius, O. (2021). A climatology of sub-seasonal temporal clustering of extreme precipitation in Switzerland and its links to extreme discharge. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 21(10), 2949-2972. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2949-2021
  43. Wibisono, S., Anwar, M. T., Supriyanto, A., & Amin, I. H. A. (2021, April). Multivariate weather anomaly detection using DBSCAN clustering algorithm. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1869, No. 1, p. 012077). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012077