سنجش و ارزیابی جامعه شناختی تاب‏ آوری شهر ورامین در برابر مخاطرات ناشی از تغییرات اقلیمی

نوع مقاله : مقاله کامل

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشکدة علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان

2 دانشیار گروه جغرافیای طبیعی، دانشکدة جغرافیا، دانشگاه تهران

3 دانشجوی دکتری آب و هواشناسی گروه جغرافیا، دانشکدة علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان

10.22059/jphgr.2021.281426.1007382

چکیده

از آنجا که تاب‏آوری به توانایی یک مجموعه برای بازگشت به شرایط طبیعی پس از وقوع بلا دلالت دارد، هدف از مطالعة حاضر سنجش و ارزیابی سطح تاب‏آوری شهر ورامین در مواجهه با مخاطرات ناشی از تغییرات اقلیمی از دیدگاه شهروندان آن است. این مطالعة توصیفی- تحلیلی، با مشارکت 393 نفر از شهروندان ورامین در پاسخ به پرسش‏نامه‏ای با آلفای کرونباخ 89/0، که بر اساس مؤلفه‏های چهارگانة محیطی، اقتصادی- اجتماعی، زیربنایی، و نهادی طراحی شده بود، انجام شده است. تحلیل آمار توصیفی و استنباطی هر یک از مؤلفه‏ها و شاخص‏های آن‏ها در نرم‏افزار SPSS21 با استفاده از آزمون One Sample T-test محاسبه و با استفاده از آزمون فریدمن اولویت‏بندی شد. نتایج حاصل از سنجش میزان تاب‏آوری شهر ورامین با تأکید بر مخاطرات ناشی از تغییرات اقلیمی نشان داد که میزان تاب‏آوری از دیدگاه شهروندان 15/2 بوده که از متوسط مطلوب پایین‏تر است و بیانگر این است که شهروندان ورامین را در برابر مخاطرات ناشی از تغییرات اقلیمی آسیب‏پذیر می‏دانند. همچنین، از دیدگاه شهروندان، مؤلفه‏های اقتصادی- اجتماعی و زیربنایی میزان تاب‏آوری بالاتری نسبت به مؤلفه‏های محیطی و نهادی دارند. بنا بر پیشنهادهای به‏دست‏آمده از شهروندان، همکاری دولت، نهادهای محلی، و سازمان‏های آموزشی برای آگاهی‏دادن به افزایش مشارکت‏ شهروندی در کاهش و سازگاری با اثرهای تغییرات آب‏وهوایی و بهبود تاب‏آوری شهری مؤثر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Measurement and sociological assessment of the resilience of Varamin city versus climate change

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abdollah fraji 1
  • Aliakbar Shamsipour 2
  • Sepideh Barzaman 3
1 Assistant Prof. in Geography department, Zanjan University
2 Physical geography department, Geography faculty, Tehran university, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD student of Climatology, Zanjan University
چکیده [English]

Introduction:
Over the last decades, urbanization developmenting and weakness in accurate and comprehensive planning to develop and rapid population growth have caused many challenges for cities. Urban sprawl beginning in the developed countries around 1950 is currently experienced in almost all countries. Many studies on the effects of urban sprawl indicate the emergence of harmful effects of this phenomenon. One of the most important environmental effects is the changes in climate. Most urban settlements are prone to future shocks and tensions due to climate changes, lack of energy and global population growth. Urban managers and planners’ responses to these shocks and what cities should do to adapt to accidents and dangers are now discussed in “resilient cities” topic. Many cities have not yet addressed climate risks due to lack of relevant city policies and action plans, outmoded regulations on urban planning, lack of capacity to respond to climate disasters, and lack of public awareness. The Urban Climate Resilience practice area represents the intersection between WRI Ross Center for Sustainable Cities and World Resources Institute’s Climate Resilience Practice. The urbanization trends in Iran during last decades had been accelerated by high rate of rural-urban migration along with rapid socio-economic and political changes that formed unbalanced urban growth in Iran. Since resilience refers to the ability of a system to return to its natural conditions after an accident, the purpose of the present study is to test and evaluate the level of resilience of Varamin City in the face of climate changes from its citizens’ viewpoint.

Materials and Methodology:
In the present research, two types of data have been used. The first type of data includes the climate components gathering the Varamin weather station (annual average rainfall, temperature, etc.). The second set corresponds to components relevant to urban sprawl, among which, urban area, population density and urban population. These parameters were obtained by questionnaires which have been filled out by varamin citizens. This descriptive analytical study was conducted with the participation of 393 citizens of Varamin City. The research tool used for data collection was a 35-item researcher-made questionnaire based on previous studies containing the appropriate items to test each of the components. To conform to the research population, the questionnaire was investigated and reviewed by professors and experts in multiple steps and its face validity and content validity were confirmed. In order to assess the reliability of the questionnaires, first, 30 copies of the questionnaire were completed by the citizens of Varamin in a preliminary research. The obtained information entered SPSS 21 and each response was assigned a score of 0-5. After the analysis, the reliability of the questionnaire was estimated by Cronbach’s alpha to be 0.89 that was designed based on the environmental, socio-economic, infrastructure, and institutional components. Analysis and prioritization of the descriptive and inferential analytical statistics the resilience of each of the components and their indices were calculated by SPSS 21 using the one sample T-test and then they were prioritized by Friedman test.

Results and Discussion:
Today, the relationships between human societies and their natural environment has been strongly affected by urbanization and urban development. Cities can be considered as ecological units and studied within the framework of a data-retrieval system. That is, to meet various needs of citizens, the city needs inevitable to provide massive data in key inputs, the most important of which are energy, food and water.
Results of measuring resilience of Varamin City with an emphasis on climatic aspects showed that from the citizens’ viewpoint, the resilience was 2.15, which was lower than the desirable average level. It indicates that the citizens consider Varamin vulnerable to climate hazards. Results of investigating resilience components of Varamin City showed that the environmental component and its indices were lower than the average level and according to the citizens intensified drought and changes in temperature have the most negative effects on the environmental condition of resilience in Varamin City. Moreover, according to the citizens, Varamin City is vulnerable to the increase in temperature and drought and these two indices need to be taken into consideration to increase the urban resilience. Although, they believed that the socio-economic and infrastructure components had higher resilience levels compared to the environmental and institutional ones. The socioeconomic component and most of its indices were above the average level and according to the citizens, helping the citizens in case of critical situations and kinship are most significant in the socioeconomic resilience of Varamin City when faced with climate changes. Results of investigating the infrastructural component showed that this component and most of its indices were lower than the average level. Therefore, it can be stated that this city is not in a good condition in infrastructural aspect and is vulnerable in this regard. Furthermore, according to the citizens, the index of “access to health centers” was the most significant infrastructural index. Investigation of the resilience level of the institutional component, it was found that all the indices of the institutional component were lower than the average and the scores of Friedman Test showed that from the citizens’ viewpoint, the municipal services in creating green space and satisfaction from the performance of the organizations in charge of informing to face hazards had the highest significance in the institutional resilience of Varamin City. Although apart from the socioeconomic components, other components in the present study were lower than the average level, since the environmental and institutional components were the least resilient components, respectively, strengthening them should be placed in the priorities of the urban development plans of Varamin City.

Conclusion:
Since climate change and its effects are increasing more than before in human societies, especially in urban communities, investigation of the indices ad components of resilience and evaluating them when urban communities face future climate crises and preventive measures are very effective and essential. Furthermore, the increase of the general knowledge regarding the climate changes motivates people to investigate the effects of this issue even more. Therefore, the serious cooperation of the government, local entities, educational organizations, municipal and media in increasing the citizens’ awareness will make the citizens respond significantly to reduce and adapt with the consequences of climate changes through citizen participation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • resilience
  • climate change
  • Compatibility
  • Sustainable Development
  • Varamin
آروین، م. (1398). ارزیابی اثرات دلبستگی مکانی بر میزان تاب‏آوری اجتماعی در شهرها (مطالعة موردی: منطقة 12 کلان‏شهر تهران)، پژوهش و برنامه‏ریزی شهری، 10(۳۸): 77-88.
پریزادی، ط.؛ شیخ‏الاسلامی، ع. و کریمی ‏رزکانی ع. (1398). تحلیل وضعیت تاب‏آوری شهری در برابر مخاطرات طبیعی (مورد مطالعه: شهر باقرشهر)، پژوهش و برنامه‏ریزی شهری، 10 (۳۷): 41-54.
حاتمی‏نژاد، ح.؛ عیوضلو، د. و خزائی‏زاده، ف. (1395). بررسی رابطة سرمایة اجتماعی و رضایت از کیفیت زندگی در فضاهای شهری (مطالعة موردی: منطقة 9 شهرداری تهران)، پژوهش‏های جغرافیای انسانی،  48(۲): ۳۴۹-361.
داداش‏پور، ه. و عادلی، ز. (1394). سنجش ظرفیت‏های تاب‏آوری در مجموعۀ شهری قزوین، مدیریت بحران، 4(۲): ۷۳-84.
رفیعیان، م.؛ رضایی، م.ر.؛ عسگری، ع.؛ پرهیزگار، ا. و شایان، س. (1390). تبیین مفهومی تاب‏آوری و شاخص‏سازی آن در مدیریت سوانح اجتماع‏محور، فصل‏نامة برنامه‏ریزی و آمایش فضا، 15(۴): ۲۸-41.
رمضان‏زاده لسبوئی، م. (1395). مبانی و مفاهیم تاب‏آوری شهری (مدل‏ها و الگوها)، مرکز مطالعات و برنامه‏ریزی شهری تهران.
روستایی، ش.؛ حقی، و.ح. و جداری، ا. (1398). ارزیابی میزان تاب‏آوری کالبدی محیط‏های شهری در برابر زلزله (نمونة موردی کلان‏شهر تبریز)،  11(۴۳): 121-141.
ساسان‏پور، ف.؛ آهنگری، ن. و حاجی‏نژاد، ص. (1397). ارزیابی تاب‏آوری منطقة 12 کلان‏شهر تهران در برابر مخاطرات طبیعی، نشریة تحلیل فضایی مخاطرات محیطی، ۴ (۳): ۸۵-98.
شکری فیروزجاه، پ. (1396). تحلیل فضایی میزان تاب‏آوری مناطق شهر بابل در برابر مخاطرات محیطی، برنامه‏ریزی توسعة کالبدی، ۲(۲): ۲۷-44.
صائمی‏پور، ح.؛ قربانی، م.؛ ملکیان، آ. و رمضان‏زاده لسبوئی، م. (1397). سنجش و ارزیابی تاب‏آوری ذی‏نفعان محلی در مواجهه با خشک‏سالی (منطقة مورد مطالعه: روستای نردین، شهرستان میامی، استان سمنان)، نشریة مرتع، 12(۱): ۶۲- 72.
طرح تفصیلی شهرستان ورامین (1393)، شرکت مهندسین مشاور پژوهش و عمران.
فرزاد بهتاش، م.ر.؛ کی‏نژاد، م.ع.؛ پیربابایی، م.ت. و عسگری، ع. (1392). ارزیابی و تحلیل ابعاد و مؤلفه‏های تاب‏آوری کلان‏شهر تبریز، نشریة هنرهای زیبا،  18(۳): ۳۳-42.
لنگرنشین، ع.؛ ارغان، ع. و کرکه‏آبادی، ز. (1398). سنجش شاخص‏ها و الگوهای اثرگذار در تاب‏آوری بافت‏های شهری تجریش، جنت‏آباد شمالی، و فردوسی شهر تهران، نگرش‏های نو در جغرافیای انسانی، 11(۳): 245-270.
ناظمی، ز.؛ قلعه‏نویی، م. و معززی مهرطهران، ا.م. (1394). طراحی فضاهای شهری تاب‏آور با تأکید بر جنبه‏های کالبدی- عملکردی، پایان‏نامة کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه هنر اصفهان.
Adger, W.N.; Hughes, T.P.; Folke, C.; Carpenter, S.R. and Rockström, J. (2005). Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science, 309(5737):1036-1039.
Aldrich, D.P. (2010). Fixing recovery: Social capital in post-crisis resilience, Journal of Homeland Security, Forthcoming.
Al-Nammari, F. and Alzaghal, M. (2015). Towards local disaster risk reduction in developing countries: Challenges from Jordan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12: 34-41.
Asian Development Bank (2011). Asian Development Bank: Sustainability Report. Asian Development Bank.
Ayling, J. (2009). Criminal organizations and resilience, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 37(4): 182-196.
Berkes, F.; Armitage, D. and Doubleday, N. (2007). Synthesis: adapting, innovating, evolving. Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning and multi-level governance, pp.308-327.
Brand, F. and Jax, K. (2007). Focusing the meaning (s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecology and society, 12(1).
Dadashpoor, H. Adeli, Z. (2016). Measuring the Amount of Regional Resilience in Qazvin Urban Region. Journal of Emergency Management, 4(2): 73-84.
Detailed plan of Varamin City (2014). Research & Development Consulting Engineers.
Farzad Behtash, M.R.; Keynejhad, M.A.; Pirbabaei, M.T. and Asgary, A. (2013). Evaluation and Analysis of Dimensions and Components of Tabriz Metropolis Resiliency, Honaryahe Ziba Memari va Shahrsazi, 18(3): 33-42.
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global environmental change, 16(3): 253-267.
Fraser, E.D. (2003). Social vulnerability and ecological fragility: building bridges between social and natural sciences using the Irish Potato Famine as a case study. Conservation Ecology, 7(2).
Garschagen, M. and Kraas, F. (2011). Urban climate change adaptation in the context of transformation: lessons from Vietnam. In Resilient cities (pp. 131-139). Springer, Dordrecht.
George, D. and Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple study guide and reference (10. Baskı).
Hatami Nejad, H.; Eyvazloo, D. and Khazaei Zadeh, F. (2016). Investigation on the Relationship between Social Capital and Satisfaction with Quality of Life in Urban Spaces (Case Study: Region Number 9, Tehran Municipality). Human Geography Research, 48(2): 349-361.
Hosseini, S.; Barker, K. and Ramirez-Marquez, J.E. (2016). A review of definitions and measures of system resilience. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 145: 47-61.
Kim, H. and Marcouiller, D.W. (2016). Natural disaster response, community resilience, and economic capacity: A case study of coastal Florida. Society & Natural Resources, 29(8): 981-997.
Klein, R.J.; Nicholls, R.J. and Thomalla, F. (2003). Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept?. Global environmental change part B: environmental hazards, 5(1): 35-45.
Lang, T. (2011). Urban resilience and new institutional theory–a happy couple for urban and regional studies?, In German annual of spatial research and policy 2010 (pp. 15-24). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Lowe, A.; Foster, J. and Winkelman, S. (2009). Ask the climate question: adapting to climate change impacts in urban regions.
Masten, A.S.; Powell, J.L. and Luthar, S.S. (2003). A resilience framework for research, policy, and practice. Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities, 1(25):  1-26, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615788.003.
Nazemi, Z.; Ghalenoei, M. and Moazzezi Mehr Tehran, A.M. (2015). Design of resilient urban spaces with emphasis on physical-functional aspects, master's thesis at Isfahan Art University.
Parry, M.L. (2009). Assessing the costs of adaptation to climate change: a review of the UNFCCC and other recent estimates. Iied.
Parsons, L. (2016). Environmental Risk and Contemporary Resilience Strategies in Rural Cambodia. The Handbook of Contemporary Cambodia, p.146.
Rafeian, M.; Rezaei, M.R.; Asgari, A.; Parhizkar, A. and Shayan, S. (2012). Explaining the concept of resilience and its indexation in disaster management, The Journal of Spatial Planning, 15(4): 28-41.
Ramezanzadeh Lasboyee, M. (2016). Basics and Concepts of Urban Conservation (Models and Patterns), Tehran Center for Urban Studies and Planning.
Rose, A. (2004). Defining and measuring economic resilience to disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 13(4): 307-314.
Saemipoor, H.; Ghorbani, M.; Malekian, A. and Ramazanzadeh Lasboei, M. (2018). Evaluating local beneficiary's resilience encountered with prolonged drought condition (Case study: Nardin village, Mayamey county, Semnan province). Journal of Rangeland, 12(1): 62-72.
Sasanpour, F.; Ahangari, N. and Hajinejad, S. (2017). Evaluation of the urban resilience against natural hazards in 12 region of Tehran Metropolis, Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazarts, 4(3): 85-98.
Shokri Firoozjah, P. (2017). Spatial Analysis of Resilience of Babol's Regions to Environmental Hazards, Journal Management System, 4: 17-44.
Smit, B. and Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global environmental change, 16(3): 282-292.
Suárez, M.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Benayas, J. and Tilbury, D. (2016). Towards an urban resilience Index: a case study in 50 Spanish cities. Sustainability, 8(8): -1-19, doi:10.3390/su8080774. 
World Bank (2010). Climate risks and adaptation in Asian coastal megacities: Synthesis report. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.