عنوان مقاله [English]
Coastal sand dunes are one of the important morphological landforms of coastal areas. These hills have been developed by interactions of sea waves, sea currents, winds and sediment materials on the coast. The sand dunes can protect the coast against waves and erosion. Thus, it is essential to protect these hills using management measures. The study area of this research is located between the Sirik port and the port of Ziarat, in the southeast part of Hormozgan province. Since the construction of new docks in recent years has led to changes in the coast of this region, so awareness of the vulnerability of the coastal hills can be effective in managing and protecting them. The purpose of this study is to assess vulnerability of the sand dunes by model DVI (Dune Vulnerability Index). A checklist is usually employed to evaluate the vulnerability index. In this research, effective factors in coastal sand dunes, geomorphologic conditions of sand dunes, marine factors, wind processes, vegetation, effects of human activities and management factors were evaluated using the checklist.
Materials and methods
In this study, the data from Google Earth, Landsat, and aerial photos, and questionnaires and field observations were used to complete the checklist. The steps to complete the checklist are as follows: in the first step, the value range for the quantitative variables was determined on the basis of the available structured checklists. Partial vulnerability indices are geomorphological condition (GC), marine influence (MI), aeolian influence (AI), vegetation condition (VC) and anthropogenic effects (AE). The indices were calculated as the ratio between the summations of given variable ranks within each variable class (PVi) and the total maximum possible rank within the class. A total DVI was calculated as the average of the five partial vulnerability indices (PV). The Protection Measure index (PM) was calculated separately from other factors. Lastly, the residual value as the difference between DVI and PM (DVI-PM) has been calculated to describe the stability of the dune system.
According to the studies by Davis (1995), to calculate the vulnerability index (VI), the calculation of the partial Vulnerability Index is not done and the vulnerability score from the division of the total variables obtained from all the group of variables, based on the maximum total sum of the concessions of the entire group of variables. This is obtained for each site.
Results and discussion
Partial Vulnerability (PV), for geomorphologic agent is above 0.75 in all sites. The degree of vulnerability is very severe because of characteristics of the sand dunes of the region with fine-to-good sorting on the slopes over 30 degrees.
The vulnerability to wind processes in all areas is above 0.5 and this shows high sensitivity of this factor. One of the reasons for vulnerability of the dunes to the wind processes is the small average diameter of coastal sediments in this area. The fine sands here are exposed to retrogressive waves and are more sensitive to erosion, so beaches with fine sand grains have less resistance to erosion.
The low vegetation of the dunes in this part of the sea, in the distance between the hills and relatively high percentage of uncovered areas are other factors of high sensitivity of dunes to wind processes.
The degree of vulnerability to vegetation condition is very severe in sites 4, 5 and 6, and is low in enclosures 1, 2 and 3. The vegetation condition was compared with 1966 aerial photos and satellite imagery from 2000 to 2016. This implies an increase in vegetation in 1966 and 2000, due to planting and plant care by government office like office of natural resource in Hormozgan.
The level of vulnerability to the human factors of sites 1 and 2 is moderate and in the other sites it is negligible. With the use of aerial photographs and satellite imagery, during the years mentioned above, the roads in this area have been increased and in some areas the roads cross the dunes. During these years, some parts of the dunes have been cleared for construction. In addition, the construction of three new wharfs in 3 Sirik (2007), Ziarat (2012) and Taheroi port (2013) has also been associated with shore changes.
According to the field observations and the results of the questionnaires (interviews with local people and experts), it can be asserted that no management action such as specifying buffer areas for access restrictions has been taken to protect the beaches.
The only protective measure is the planting of seedlings in sites 1, 2 and 3 through natural resources organization.
The overall values of DVI in all areas were moderate. Among the investigated factors, the morphological condition of sand dunes and the wind processes have the highest influence on the vulnerability of the dunes. The results for the DVI-PM index indicate that all sites need quick management.
Based on the obtained equilibrium index, there is no equilibrium between vulnerability and dune management in any of the sites. This indicated the lack of management or inadequacy. One of the reasons for lack of management or efficent management is that there is no a certain organization responsible for these kinds of protection measures.
Comparison of the two methods for calculation of vulnerability, DiPanjun (2014) and the Davis (1995) method), shows that the severity of the vulnerability of the sites is moderate in both methods. There is no difference between the qualitive results obtained in the two methods.
حجازی، س.ا. و محمودی، ش. (1396). بررسی ویژگیهای بافتی رسوبات تپههای ماسهای شرق شهرستان جاسک، فصلنامة علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات سپهر، 26(۱۰۱): 119-129.
رامشت، م.ح.؛ سیف، ع. و محمودی، ش. (1394). بررسی تغییرات طبیعی تپههای ماسهای شرق جاسک در بازة زمانی (1383-1369) بهوسیلة GIS وRS ، جغرافیا و توسعه، 31: 121-136.
شایان، س.؛ اکبریان، م.؛ یمانی، م.؛ شریفیکیا، م. و مقصودی، م. (1393). هیدرودینامیک دریا و تأثیر آن در تشکیل تودههای ماسهای ساحلی مطالعة موردی: سواحل غربی مکران، پژوهشهای ژئومورفولوژی کمی، ۲(۴): 76-104.
صدوق، س.ح.؛ نظاممحله، خ. و نظاممحله، م.ع. (1392). بررسی میزان آسیبپذیری تپههای ماسهای ساحلیDVI در شبهجزیرة میانکاله با مدل، پژوهشهای ژئومورفولوژی کمی، ۲(۱): 37-48.
مختاری، د.؛ رضاییمقدم، م.ح. و محمودی، ش. (1396). بررسی آسیبپذیری تپههای ماسهای ساحل شرقی بندر جاسک با استفاده از مدل DVI، مجلة پژوهشهای ژئومورفولوژی کمی، ۶(۱): 90-107.
نوحهگر، ا. و یمانی، م. ( 1385). ژئومورفولوژی ساحل شرقی تنگة هرمز با تأکید بر فرسایش بادی، انتشارات دانشگاه هرمزگان.
یمانی، م. و هدایی، ع. (1383). بررسی وضعیت رسوب و فرسایش در حوضههای آبریز منتهی به تنگة هرمز، پژوهشهای جغرافیایی، 50: 117-143.
Alveirinho Dias, J.; Williams, A.T.; Garcia Novo, F.; Garcia Mora, M.R.; Curr, R. and Pereira, A. (2001). Integrated coastal dune management: Checklists, Continental Shelf Research, 21: 1937-1960.
Bodere, J.C.l.; Cribb, R.; Curr, R.H.F.; Davies, P.; Hallegouet, B.; Meur, C.; Pirou, N.; Williams, A.T. and Yoni, C. (1994). Vulnerabilite des dunes littorales: Mise aupoint d’une method d’evaluation, In: Miossec, A. (Ed.), Defense des cotesouprotection de l’espace littoral’, Cahiers Nantais, URA 904, CNRS, Commission surl’ Environnementcotier de l’UGI, 41-42: 197-201.
Davies, P.; Curr, R.H.F.; Williams, A.T.; Halle!gouet, B.; Bodere, J.C.L. and Koh, A. (1995a). Dune management strategies: a semi-quantitative assessment of the interrelationship between coastal dune vulnerability and protection measures. In: Salman, A.P.H.M., Berends, P., Bonazountas, M. (Eds.), Coastal Management and Habitat Conservation, EUCC, Netherlands, PP. 313-331.
Davies, P.; Williams, A.T.1 and Curr, R.H.F. (1995b). Decision making in dune management: theory and practice, Journal of Coastal Conservation, 1: 87-96.
Dipanjan, D.M.; Swagata, B.; Barendra, P.; Ashis, K. and Paul, U.B. (2014). Insights into the dichotomy of coastal dune vulnerability and protection measures from multi-criteria decision analysis: a case study of West Bengal Coast, Bay of Bengal, India, Journal of coastal sciences, 1(1): 47-57.
Garcia-Mora, M.R.; Gallego-Fernandez, J.B. and Garcia-Novo F. (2000). Plant Diversity as a Suitable Tool for Coastal Dune Vulnerability Assessment, Journal of Coastal Research, 16(4): 990-995.
Garcia-Mora, M.R.; Gallego-Fernandez, J.B.; Williams, A.T. and Garcia-Novo, F. (2001). A Coastal Dune Vulnerability Classification (A Case Study of the SW Iberian Peninsula), Journal of Coastal Research, 17(4): 802-811.
Hejazi, S.A. and Mahmoodi, SH. (2017). Investigation of Textural Characteristics of Sediments of Sandy Dunes in Eastern of Jask county, Scientific - Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), 26(101): 119-129.
Ingrida, B.; Loreta, K and Tarmo, S. (2015). Multi-criteria evaluation approach to coastal vulnerability index development in micrzo-tidal low-lying areas, Ocean & Coastal Management, 104: 124-135.
Marlow, R. and Morris, A. (2003). The vulnerability and management of three sand dune sites in southwestern Turkey, In: Ozhan, E. (Ed.), Procceedings of the Sixth International Conferenceon the Mediterranean Coastal Environment, MEDCOAST 2003, Ravenna, Italy, PP. 1381-1391.
Martinez, M.L.; GallegoFernandez, J.B.; Garcia Franco, J.G.; Moctezuma, C. and Jimenez, C.D. (2006). Assessment of coastal dune vulnerability to natural and anthropogenic disturbances along the Gulf of Mexico, Environmental Conservation, 33: 109-117.
Mokhtari, D.; Rezaimoghadam, M.H. and Mahmoodi, SH. (2017). Vulnerability assessment sand dunes east coast port of Jask using DVI model, Quantitative geomorphological researches, 6(1): 90-107.
Nohegar, A. and Yamani, M. (2004). The coastal geomorphology of east Hormoz strait with focus on wind erosion, hormozgan university.
Oliveira, A. and Melo e Souza, R. (2009). Coastal dune ecodynamics of the southern coastline from Sergipe, Brazil, Journal of Coastal Research, 56: 342-346.
Pereira, A.R.; Laranjeira, M.M. and Neves, M. (2000). A resilience checklist to evaluate coastal dune vulnerability, Periodicum Biologorum,102,(Suppl. 1): 309-318.
Ramesht, M.H.; Sief, A. and Mahmoodi, SH. (2015). Investigation of natural variations of sand dunes of east jask during the period (1383-1386) by RS, GIS, Geography and development, 31: 121-136.
Sadogh, S.; Nezammahale, KH. and Nezammahale, M.A. (2013). Investigation of the vulnerability of coastal sand dunes in the Miankale Peninsula by DVI model, Quantitative geomorphological researches, 2(1): 37-48.
Shayan, S.; Akbarian, M.; Yamani, M. and Maghsodi, M. (2014). Hydrodynamics of the sea and its effect on coastal sand formation. Case study: Makran's western coasts, Quantitative geomorphological researches, 2(4): 76-104.
Taylor, J.W. (1961). How to create ideas, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, NJ.Thieler, E.R., Hammar-Klose, E.S., 1999, National Assessment of Coastal Vulnerability to Future Sea-Level Rise: Preliminary Results for the U.S. Atlantic Coast, Open-File Report, U.S. Geological Survey, PP. 99-593.
Valles, S.M.; Fernandez, J.B.G. and Dellafiore, C.M. (2011). Dune vulnerability in relation to tourismpressure in Central Gulf of Cadiz (S W Spain), a case study, Journal of Coastal Research, 27(2): 243-251.
Williams, A.T.; Alveirinho Dias, J.; Garcia Novo, F.; Garcia Mora, M.R.; Curr, R. and Pereira, A. (2001). Integrated coastal dune management: Checklists, Continental Shelf Research, 21: 1937-1960.
Williams, A.T.; Davies, P.; Alveirinho-Dias, J.M.; Pereira, A.R.; Garc!ıa-Mora, M.R. and Tejada, M. (1994). A re-evaluation of dune vulnerability checklist parameters,Gaia 8, 179-182.
Williams, A.T.; Davies, P.; Curr, R.; Koh, A.; Bodere, J.C.; Hallegouet, B.; Meur, C. and Yoni, C. (1993). A checklist assessment of dune vulnerability and protectionin Devon and Cornwall, UK. In: Magoon, O.T. (Ed.), Coastal Zone’93, American Society of Civil Engineering, New York, PP. 3394-3408.
Williams, A.T.; Duck, R.W. and Phillips, M.R. (2011). Coastal dune vulnerability among selected Scottish systems, Journal of Coastal Research, 64: 1263-1267.
Yamani, M. and Hodaei, A. (2005). Assessment of sediment and erosion in the watersheds leading to the Strait of Hormoz, Physical geography reaserch, 5: 117-143.